Itagaki Shinobu, Toyoda Nana, Egorova Natalia, Sun Erick, Lee Timothy, Boateng Percy, Gibson Gregory, Moss Noah, Mancini Donna, Adams David H, Anyanwu Anelechi C
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jan;167(1):205-214.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.02.058. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
Although the SynCardia total artificial heart (SynCardia Systems, LLC) was approved for use as a bridge to transplantation in 2004 in the United States, most centers do not adopt the total artificial heart as a standard bridging strategy for patients with biventricular failure. This study was designed to characterize the current use and outcomes of patients placed on total artificial heart support.
The United Network of Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Research File was queried to identify total artificial heart implantation in the United States between 2005 and 2018. Multivariable Cox regression models were used for risk prediction.
A total of 471 patients (mean age, 49 years; standard deviation, 13 years; 88% were male) underwent total artificial heart implantation. Of 161 transplant centers, 11 centers had cumulative volume of 10 or more implants. The 6-month cumulative incidence of mortality on the total artificial heart was 24.6%. The 6-month cumulative incidence of transplant was 49.0%. The 1-year mortality post-transplantation was 20.0%. Cumulative center volume less than 10 implants was predictive of both mortality on the total artificial heart (hazard ratio, 2.2, 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.1, P < .001) and post-transplant mortality after a total artificial heart bridge (hazard ratio, 1.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.2, P = .039).
Total artificial heart use is low, but the total artificial heart can be an option for biventricular bridge to transplant with acceptable bridge to transplant and post-transplant survival, especially in higher-volume centers. The observation of inferior outcomes in lower-volume centers raises questions as to whether targeted training, center certifications, and minimum volume requirements could improve outcomes for patients requiring the total artificial heart.
尽管SynCardia全人工心脏(SynCardia Systems有限责任公司)于2004年在美国被批准用作移植桥梁,但大多数中心并未将全人工心脏作为双心室衰竭患者的标准桥梁策略。本研究旨在描述接受全人工心脏支持患者的当前使用情况和结局。
查询器官共享联合网络标准移植研究文件,以确定2005年至2018年在美国进行的全人工心脏植入情况。使用多变量Cox回归模型进行风险预测。
共有471例患者(平均年龄49岁;标准差13岁;88%为男性)接受了全人工心脏植入。在161个移植中心中,11个中心的累积植入量为10例或更多。全人工心脏使用时6个月的累积死亡率为24.6%。6个月的累积移植率为49.0%。移植后1年的死亡率为20.0%。累积中心植入量少于10例可预测全人工心脏使用时的死亡率(风险比,2.2;95%置信区间,1.5 - 3.1;P <.001)以及全人工心脏作为桥梁后的移植后死亡率(风险比,1.5;95%置信区间,1.0 - 2.2;P = 0.039)。
全人工心脏的使用量较低,但全人工心脏可作为双心室移植桥梁的一种选择,具有可接受的移植桥梁期和移植后生存率,尤其是在植入量较高的中心。在植入量较低的中心观察到较差的结局,这引发了关于有针对性的培训、中心认证和最低植入量要求是否可以改善需要全人工心脏患者结局的问题。