Carter Marissa J
Strategic Solutions, Inc.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug 9;5(2):125-139. doi: 10.36469/001c.35589. eCollection 2018.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are a well-known complication of posterior fossa neurosurgery. The use of dural repair adjuncts has been associated with fewer CSF leaks and subsequently, lower medical costs. To determine if the use of polyethylene glycol hydrogel sealant (DuraSeal dural sealant system [DuraSeal]), resulted in cost savings in the United States compared to use of fibrin glue in posterior fossa neurosurgery based on a published study of these two products. Primary analysis was based on a published cohort study (100 patients per cohort). Adjustments were made to account for the longer follow-up time of the fibrin glue cohort to better capture the incidence of CSF leaks, pseudomeningocele, wound infection, and meningitis using additional data from the literature. Resource utilization was calculated from literature studies and confirmed with consultations from two practicing neurosurgeons. The effective time horizon was 19 months. Undiscounted Medicare payments were used to calculate unit costs from a payer's perspective based on hospital stay, cost of sealant application, and cost of complications. One-way sensitivity analysis was used to examine changes in costs as a result of model input changes. In the base case, the cost of the hospital stay for the original surgery, which excludes the cost of complications, dominated costs for both cohorts. On a per patient basis, the use of fibrin glue cost $1666 more than the use of DuraSeal. Sensitivity analysis showed that using lumbar drainage instead of operative repair for a CSF leak reduced cost savings to $680. Holding the incidence of CSF leaks constant for the fibrin glue cohort while increasing the incidence for the DuraSeal cohort by 50% or 300% resulted in cost savings of $1438 and $755, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate a positive, consistent cost-benefit of DuraSeal compared to fibrin glue based on a cohort study of real world patients who underwent posterior fossa neurosurgery.
脑脊液(CSF)漏是后颅窝神经外科手术中一种众所周知的并发症。使用硬脑膜修复辅助材料与脑脊液漏减少相关,进而降低了医疗成本。基于对这两种产品的一项已发表研究,确定在美国后颅窝神经外科手术中,与使用纤维蛋白胶相比,使用聚乙二醇水凝胶密封剂(DuraSeal硬脑膜密封剂系统[DuraSeal])是否能节省成本。主要分析基于一项已发表的队列研究(每个队列100例患者)。进行了调整,以考虑纤维蛋白胶队列更长的随访时间,利用文献中的额外数据更好地捕捉脑脊液漏、假性脑脊膜膨出、伤口感染和脑膜炎的发生率。资源利用情况根据文献研究计算得出,并经两位执业神经外科医生会诊确认。有效时间范围为19个月。基于住院时间、密封剂应用成本和并发症成本,从不计折扣的医疗保险支付角度计算单位成本,以支付方视角进行计算。采用单向敏感性分析来检验模型输入变化导致的成本变化。在基础案例中,原手术的住院成本(不包括并发症成本)在两个队列的成本中占主导地位。按每位患者计算,使用纤维蛋白胶的成本比使用DuraSeal多1666美元。敏感性分析表明,对于脑脊液漏采用腰椎引流而非手术修复会使成本节省降至680美元。在纤维蛋白胶队列中脑脊液漏发生率保持不变的情况下,将DuraSeal队列的发生率提高50%或300%,分别可节省成本1438美元和755美元。这项研究的结果表明,基于对接受后颅窝神经外科手术的真实世界患者的队列研究,与纤维蛋白胶相比,DuraSeal具有积极且一致的成本效益。