• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留肾单位手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术对上尿路尿路上皮癌患者肾功能的生存及长期影响

Survival and Long-term Effects of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy on Kidney Function in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

作者信息

Hendriks Nora, Baard Joyce, Beerlage Harrie P, Schout Barbara M A, Doherty Klara S G, Pelger Rob C M, Kamphuis Guido M

机构信息

Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Urology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 May 2;40:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.007. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.007
PMID:35638087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9142752/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines discriminate between high- and low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to determine treatment by means of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) or kidney-sparing surgery (KSS).

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term oncological outcomes and renal function for patients with UTUC treated by RNU versus KSS.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study, including 186 renal units with nonmetastatic UTUC treated in a tertiary referral centre between 2010 and 2021, was conducted.

INTERVENTION

RNU, ureterorenoscopy, percutaneous tumour resection, and segmental ureteral resection.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and renal function were analysed by means of the log-rank test and the independent-sample test.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

OS was 71.1% for the RNU group and 81.9% for the KSS group. In a cohort matched for propensity weight based on EAU risk stratification progression-free survival (PFS; RNU 96.0%; KSS 86.0%), MFS (RNU 72.0%; KSS 84.0%), CSS (RNU 84.0%; KSS 86.0%), and OS (RNU 76.0%; KSS 76.0%) were all similar between both groups. No significant differences in renal function were seen at 2 and 5 yr after the intervention. Although this series represents the largest cohort of (high-risk) UTUC patients treated by means of KSS to date, it is not suitable for performing a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

PFS, MFS, CSS, and OS were all comparable when analysing the RNU and KSS groups. Similar results for groups with evenly distributed risk factors and a large percentage of high-risk disease suggest that current risk stratification might not be accurate in discriminating low-risk from high-risk disease.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this report, we looked at outcomes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in a specialised hospital. We conclude that kidney-sparing surgery and radical nephroureterectomy have comparable outcomes and that risk factors for worse outcome might not be identified correctly.

摘要

背景

当前欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)指南区分高风险和低风险上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC),以通过根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)或保留肾单位手术(KSS)来确定治疗方案。

目的

比较接受RNU与KSS治疗的UTUC患者的长期肿瘤学结局和肾功能。

设计、设置与参与者:开展了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入2010年至2021年间在一家三级转诊中心接受治疗的186个患有非转移性UTUC的肾单位。

干预措施

RNU、输尿管肾镜检查、经皮肿瘤切除术和节段性输尿管切除术。

结局测量与统计分析

采用对数秩检验和独立样本检验分析无复发生存率、无转移生存率(MFS)、总生存率(OS)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和肾功能。

结果与局限性

RNU组的OS为71.1%,KSS组为81.9%。在根据EAU风险分层进行倾向权重匹配的队列中,两组的无进展生存率(PFS;RNU为96.0%;KSS为86.0%)、MFS(RNU为72.0%;KSS为84.0%)、CSS(RNU为84.0%;KSS为86.0%)和OS(RNU为76.0%;KSS为76.0%)均相似。干预后2年和5年时,肾功能未见显著差异。尽管该系列是迄今为止接受KSS治疗的(高风险)UTUC患者的最大队列,但不适合进行多变量分析。

结论

分析RNU组和KSS组时,PFS、MFS、CSS和OS均具有可比性。风险因素均匀分布且高风险疾病占比很大的组的类似结果表明,当前的风险分层在区分低风险和高风险疾病方面可能不准确。

患者总结

在本报告中,我们研究了一家专科医院中上尿路尿路上皮癌的结局。我们得出结论,保留肾单位手术和根治性肾输尿管切除术的结局具有可比性,且可能无法正确识别不良结局的风险因素。

相似文献

1
Survival and Long-term Effects of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy on Kidney Function in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.保留肾单位手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术对上尿路尿路上皮癌患者肾功能的生存及长期影响
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 May 2;40:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.007. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Kidney-Sparing Surgery Has Equivalent Oncological Outcomes to Radical Nephroureterectomy for Ureteral Urothelial Carcinoma.保肾手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗输尿管尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局相当。
J Endourol. 2024 Sep;38(9):921-928. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0061. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel.保留肾单位手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:EAU 非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌指南小组的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1052-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
4
Endoscopic intervention versus radical nephroureterectomy for the management of localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.内镜介入与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗局限性上尿路上皮癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2024 May 14;42(1):318. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05032-y.
5
Oncologic outcomes of patients treated with kidney-sparing surgery or radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a population-based study.保留肾单位手术或根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的肿瘤学结局:一项基于人群的研究。
Urol Oncol. 2024 Jan;42(1):22.e1-22.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.019. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
6
Kidney sparing surgery in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: paradigm change in surgical treatment for ureter cancer.上尿路尿路上皮癌的保留肾手术:输尿管癌手术治疗的范式转变
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(15):13717-13725. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05207-x. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
7
Adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy improves the survival outcome of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with cardiovascular comorbidity.根治性肾输尿管切除术(radical nephroureterectomy)后辅助化疗可改善伴有心血管合并症的高危上尿路上皮癌患者的生存结局。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 19;10(1):17674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74940-x.
8
Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An European Association of Urology Guidelines Systematic Review.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与开放根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:欧洲泌尿外科学会指南系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):205-223. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Optimization of postoperative surveillance protocols in upper tract urothelial cancer: A retrospective cohort study.上尿路尿路上皮癌术后监测方案的优化:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 14;13:1143030. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1143030. eCollection 2023.
10
Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of risk stratification: long-term results and follow-up.2018 年斯德哥尔摩 UTUC 咨询会议:风险分层的长期结果和随访。
World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2289-2296. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02739-1. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of kidney-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for high-risk middle-lower ureteral urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.保留肾单位手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗高危中下段输尿管尿路上皮癌的疗效比较:一项回顾性分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 22. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04618-8.
2
New Insights into Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Lessons Learned from the ROBUUST Collaborative Study.上尿路尿路上皮癌的新见解:从ROBUUST协作研究中获得的经验教训。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 15;17(10):1668. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101668.
3
Kidney sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel Classification for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma to Better Risk-stratify Patients Eligible for Kidney-sparing Strategies: An International Collaborative Study.上尿路尿路上皮癌的新分类方法,以便更好地对适合保肾策略的患者进行风险分层:一项国际协作研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Mar;8(2):491-497. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update.欧洲泌尿外科学会上尿路尿路上皮癌指南:2020 年更新版。
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):62-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Cancer statistics, 2020.
上尿路尿路上皮癌保留肾手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术的Meta分析和系统评价
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 2;15:1448079. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1448079. eCollection 2025.
4
ASO Author Reflections: The Impact of Kidney-Sparing Surgery in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.ASO作者反思:保留肾手术在上尿路尿路上皮癌中的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2245-2246. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16757-w. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
5
The Long-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-Sparing Surgery in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.上尿路尿路上皮癌保留肾单位手术的长期功能及肿瘤学结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):1354-1363. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16523-y. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
6
Long segment ureterectomy with tapered demucosalized ileum replacement of ureter for ureteral cancer: a case report and literature review.长节段输尿管切除术联合去黏膜锥形回肠代输尿管治疗输尿管癌:病例报告及文献复习
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 9;14:1426003. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1426003. eCollection 2024.
7
Navigating the Aftermath: A Comprehensive Scoping Review on Follow-up Strategies After Kidney-sparing Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.应对后果:关于上尿路尿路上皮癌保留肾单位手术后随访策略的全面范围综述
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Jul 3;66:82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.005. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Changes in Renal Function After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer in Elderly Patients.老年患者上尿路尿路上皮癌行肾输尿管切除术后的肾功能变化
Cureus. 2024 Jun 1;16(6):e61479. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61479. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review of Current Surveillance Strategies for Non-Metastatic Disease.上尿路尿路上皮癌:非转移性疾病当前监测策略的叙述性综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 20;16(1):44. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010044.
10
Kidney sparing surgery in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: paradigm change in surgical treatment for ureter cancer.上尿路尿路上皮癌的保留肾手术:输尿管癌手术治疗的范式转变
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(15):13717-13725. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05207-x. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
Robotic radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional experience.机器人根治性肾输尿管切除术和节段性输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:多机构经验。
World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2303-2311. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02790-y. Epub 2019 May 6.
5
Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel.保留肾单位手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:EAU 非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌指南小组的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1052-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
6
Comparing Changes in Renal Function After Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma.上尿路尿路上皮癌和肾细胞癌根治性手术后肾功能变化的比较。
Urology. 2016 Oct;96:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
7
Radical nephroureterectomy versus endoscopic procedures for the treatment of localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis and a systematic review of current evidence from comparative studies.根治性肾输尿管切除术与内镜手术治疗局限性上尿路尿路上皮癌的比较:一项荟萃分析及对比较研究现有证据的系统评价
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;40(12):1629-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
8
Long-term endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: 20-year single-centre experience.长期内镜管理上尿路尿路上皮癌:20 年单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1608-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11169.x. Epub 2012 May 7.
9
Ureteroscopic and percutaneous management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): systematic review.经输尿管镜和经皮处理上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC):系统综述。
BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(5):614-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11068.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
10
Ureteroscopic and extirpative treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a 15-year comprehensive review of 160 consecutive patients.经输尿管镜和切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:160 例连续患者 15 年的综合回顾。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1618-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11066.x. Epub 2012 Mar 28.