McKinley L, Goedken C C, Balkenende E, Clore G, Hockett Sherlock S, Bartel R, Bradley S, Judd J, Lyons Goedken, Rock C, Rubin M, Shaughnessy C, Reisinger H S, Perencevich E, Safdar N
Madison VA, Madison, WI.
Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA, Iowa City, IA.
Am J Infect Control. 2023 Feb;51(2):205-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.05.014. Epub 2022 May 27.
To describe daily environmental cleaning and disinfection practices and their associations with cleaning rates while exploring contextual factors experienced by healthcare workers involved in the cleaning process.
A convergent mixed methods approach using quantitative observations (ie, direct observation of environmental service staff performing environmental cleaning using a standardized observation form) and qualitative interviews (ie, semistructured interviews of key healthcare workers) across 3 Veterans Affairs acute and long-term care facilities.
Between December 2018 and May 2019 a total of sixty-two room observations (N = 3602 surfaces) were conducted. The average observed surface cleaning rate during daily cleaning in patient rooms was 33.6% for all environmental surfaces and 60.0% for high-touch surfaces (HTS). Higher cleaning rates were observed with bathroom surfaces (Odds Ratio OR = 3.23), HTSs (OR = 1.57), and reusable medical equipment (RME) (OR = 1.40). Lower cleaning rates were observed when cleaning semiprivate rooms (OR = 0.71) and rooms in AC (OR = 0.56). In analysis stratified by patient presence (ie, present, or absent) in the room during cleaning, patient absence was associated with higher cleaning rates for HTSs (OR = 1.71). In addition, the odds that bathroom surfaces being cleaned more frequently than bedroom surfaces decreased (OR = 1.97) as well as the odds that private rooms being cleaned more frequently than semi-private rooms also decreased (OR = 0.26; 0.07-0.93). Between January and June 2019 eighteen qualitative interviews were conducted and found key themes (ie, patient presence and semiprivate rooms) as potential barriers to cleaning; this supports findings from the quantitative analysis.
Overall observed rates of daily cleaning of environmental surfaces in both acute and long-term care was low. Standardized environmental cleaning practices to address known barriers, specifically cleaning practices when patients are present in rooms and semi-private rooms are needed to achieve improvements in cleaning rates.
描述日常环境清洁和消毒做法及其与清洁率的关联,同时探究参与清洁过程的医护人员所面临的背景因素。
采用聚合混合方法,对3家退伍军人事务部急性和长期护理机构进行定量观察(即使用标准化观察表直接观察环境服务人员进行环境清洁)和定性访谈(即对关键医护人员进行半结构化访谈)。
在2018年12月至2019年5月期间,共进行了62次房间观察(N = 3602个表面)。病房日常清洁期间,所有环境表面的平均观察到的表面清洁率为33.6%,高接触表面(HTS)为60.0%。浴室表面(优势比OR = 3.23)、HTS(OR = 1.57)和可重复使用医疗设备(RME)(OR = 1.40)的清洁率较高。清洁半私人病房(OR = 0.71)和空调病房(OR = 0.56)时,清洁率较低。在按清洁期间房间内患者是否在场(即在场或不在场)分层的分析中,患者不在场与HTS的较高清洁率相关(OR = 1.71)。此外,浴室表面比卧室表面清洁更频繁的几率降低(OR = 1.97),私人病房比半私人病房清洁更频繁的几率也降低(OR = 0.26;0.07 - 0.93)。2019年1月至6月期间进行了18次定性访谈,发现关键主题(即患者在场和半私人病房)是清洁的潜在障碍;这支持了定量分析的结果。
急性和长期护理机构中环境表面的总体日常清洁率较低。需要采用标准化的环境清洁做法来解决已知障碍,特别是在房间内有患者和半私人病房时的清洁做法,以提高清洁率。