Institute for Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Otto-Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioural Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Jun 1;127(6):1655-1668. doi: 10.1152/jn.00076.2022.
Eyeblinks are the brief closures of the lid. They are accompanied by a cocontraction of the eye muscles that temporarily pulls the whole eyeball back into its socket. When blinks occur together with execution of saccadic gaze shifts, they interfere with the saccadic premotor circuit, causing these within-blink saccades to be slower than normal and also time-locked to blinks. To analyze the trajectory of within-blink saccades, subtraction of the entangled blink-related eye movement is required. Here we propose a combination of principal component analysis (PCA) and a regression model to subtract the blink-related component of the eye movement based on the respective blink metrics. We used electrooculography (EOG) to measure eye and lid movements of 12 participants who performed saccades with and without blinks. We found that within-blink saccades are slower than without-blink saccades and are tightly coupled in time to blink onset. Surprisingly, in some participants we observed large dynamic overshoots of up to 15° for saccades of only 5° amplitude. The finding of dynamic overshoots was independently confirmed by dynamic MRI for two of the participants and challenges the current view that within-blink saccades are programmed as slow, but straight, saccades. We hypothesize that the dynamic overshoots could be attributed to inhibition of omnipause neurons during blinks, the simultaneous cocontraction of extraocular muscles, or a combination of both. This study observed that people make large dynamic overshoots when making a saccadic eye movement within a blink but their eyes are back on target by the time the eyelids are open. We used electrooculography (EOG) to measure eye movements even when the lid is down and introduced a novel procedure to subtract blink-related EOG components. These findings challenge the current view that within-blink saccades are programmed as slow but straight saccades.
眨眼是眼睑的短暂闭合。它们伴随着眼外肌的协同收缩,暂时将整个眼球拉回眼眶。当眨眼与扫视性眼球运动转移同时发生时,它们会干扰扫视性前运动回路,导致这些眨眼内的扫视运动比正常情况下更慢,并与眨眼时间锁定。为了分析眨眼内扫视运动的轨迹,需要减去与眨眼相关的眼球运动的纠缠部分。在这里,我们提出了一种主成分分析 (PCA) 和回归模型的组合,根据各自的眨眼指标,基于各自的眨眼指标,减去眼球运动中的眨眼相关成分。我们使用眼电图 (EOG) 测量了 12 名参与者在进行带有和不带有眨眼的扫视运动时的眼睛和眼睑运动。我们发现,眨眼内的扫视运动比没有眨眼的扫视运动更慢,并且与眨眼开始时间紧密耦合。令人惊讶的是,在一些参与者中,我们观察到高达 15°的大动态过冲,而扫视运动的幅度仅为 5°。两名参与者的动态 MRI 独立证实了动态过冲的发现,这挑战了当前的观点,即眨眼内的扫视运动是作为缓慢但直接的扫视运动编程的。我们假设,动态过冲可能归因于眨眼期间对全方位暂停神经元的抑制、眼外肌的同时协同收缩,或两者的组合。这项研究观察到,当人们在眨眼期间进行扫视性眼球运动时,会产生大的动态过冲,但当眼睑张开时,眼睛已经回到目标位置。我们使用眼电图 (EOG) 来测量即使在眼睑关闭时的眼球运动,并引入了一种新的程序来减去与眨眼相关的 EOG 成分。这些发现挑战了当前的观点,即眨眼内的扫视运动是作为缓慢但直接的扫视运动编程的。