• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染性心内膜炎患者二尖瓣置换中机械瓣与生物瓣的长期预后比较。

Long-term outcomes of mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in native mitral valve infective endocarditis.

机构信息

Heart Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Scand Cardiovasc J. 2022 Dec;56(1):132-137. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2022.2079712.

DOI:10.1080/14017431.2022.2079712
PMID:35652503
Abstract

. To study the long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement with mechanical or biological valve prostheses in native mitral valve infective endocarditis patients. . We conducted a retrospective, nationwide, multicenter cohort study with patients aged ≤70 years who were treated with mitral valve replacement for native mitral valve infective endocarditis in Finland between 2004 and 2017. . The endpoints were all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and mitral valve reoperations. The results were adjusted for baseline features (age, gender, comorbidities, history of drug abuse, concomitant surgeries, operational urgency, and surgical center). The median follow-up time was 6.1 years. The 12-year cumulative mortality rates were 36% for mechanical prostheses and 74% for biological prostheses (adj. HR 0.40; CI: 0.17-0.91;  = 0.03). At follow-up, the ischemic stroke had occurred in 19% of patients with mechanical prosthesis and 33% of those with a biological prosthesis (adj.  = 0.52). The major bleeding rates within the 12-year follow-up period were 30% for mechanical prosthesis and 13% for a biological prosthesis (adj.  = 0.29). The mitral valve reoperation rates were 13% for mechanical prosthesis and 12% for a biological prosthesis (adj.  = 0.50). Drug abuse history did not have a significant modifying impact on the results (interaction  = 0.51 for mortality and ≥0.13 for secondary outcomes). . The use of mechanical mitral valve prosthesis is associated with lower long-term mortality compared to the biological prosthesis in non-elder native mitral valve infective endocarditis patients. The routine choice of biological mitral valve prostheses for this patient group is not supported by the results.

摘要

. 研究在芬兰患有原发性二尖瓣感染性心内膜炎的患者中,使用机械或生物瓣膜置换二尖瓣的长期结果。. 我们进行了一项回顾性、全国性、多中心队列研究,纳入了 2004 年至 2017 年期间在芬兰因原发性二尖瓣感染性心内膜炎接受二尖瓣置换术治疗且年龄≤70 岁的患者。. 终点为全因死亡率、缺血性卒中和主要出血以及二尖瓣再次手术。结果根据基线特征(年龄、性别、合并症、药物滥用史、同时手术、手术紧急程度和手术中心)进行调整。中位随访时间为 6.1 年。12 年累计死亡率分别为机械瓣膜组 36%和生物瓣膜组 74%(调整后 HR 0.40;95%CI:0.17-0.91; = 0.03)。随访时,机械瓣膜组有 19%的患者发生缺血性卒中,生物瓣膜组有 33%(调整后  = 0.52)。12 年随访期间,机械瓣膜组的主要出血发生率为 30%,生物瓣膜组为 13%(调整后  = 0.29)。机械瓣膜组的二尖瓣再次手术率为 13%,生物瓣膜组为 12%(调整后  = 0.50)。药物滥用史对结果没有显著的修正作用(死亡率的交互作用 = 0.51,次要结局的交互作用≥0.13)。. 在非老年原发性二尖瓣感染性心内膜炎患者中,与生物瓣膜相比,机械二尖瓣瓣膜置换术的长期死亡率较低。结果不支持对该患者群体常规选择生物二尖瓣瓣膜。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in native mitral valve infective endocarditis.感染性心内膜炎患者二尖瓣置换中机械瓣与生物瓣的长期预后比较。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2022 Dec;56(1):132-137. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2022.2079712.
2
Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with infective endocarditis.感染性心内膜炎患者行外科主动脉瓣置换时机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜假体的比较
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;29(3):386-392. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz122.
3
Bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis in patients aged 50 to 69 years.50 岁至 69 岁患者感染性心内膜炎的生物瓣与机械瓣二尖瓣置换。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Oct;43(10):1093-1099. doi: 10.1002/clc.23407. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
4
Infective endocarditis after surgical aortic or mitral valve replacement: A nationwide population-based study.主动脉瓣或二尖瓣置换术后感染性心内膜炎:一项基于全国人群的研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Oct;166(4):1056-1068.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.12.027. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
5
Infective endocarditis and outcomes of mitral valve replacement.感染性心内膜炎与二尖瓣置换术的预后。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Sep;51(9):e13577. doi: 10.1111/eci.13577. Epub 2021 May 1.
6
Mechanical Versus Biologic Prostheses for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 70.50 岁至 70 岁患者外科主动脉瓣置换术的机械瓣膜与生物瓣比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jul;110(1):102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.10.027. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
7
Bioprosthetic Versus Mechanical Valve Replacement for Infective Endocarditis: Focus on Recurrence Rates.生物瓣与机械瓣在感染性心内膜炎中的置换:关注复发率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jul;106(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.12.046. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Mitral valve prosthesis choice in patients <70 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 219 patients.70岁以下患者二尖瓣人工瓣膜的选择:对20219例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Card Surg. 2020 Apr;35(4):818-825. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14478. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
9
Further experience with the "no-react" bioprosthesis in patients with active infective endocarditis: 11-year single center results in 402 patients.“无反应”生物假体在活动性感染性心内膜炎患者中的进一步经验:402例患者的11年单中心研究结果
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;61(5):398-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1337903. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
10
Surgical treatment of infective mitral valve endocarditis.感染性二尖瓣心内膜炎的外科治疗
J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Sep;13(5):754-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgery for Complex vs. Simple Native Left-Sided Endocarditis: Insights from an Extended Follow-Up on Survival, Recurrent Infection, and Valve Durability.复杂性与单纯性原发性左侧心内膜炎的手术治疗:关于生存、复发性感染和瓣膜耐久性的长期随访见解
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 20;14(16):5870. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165870.
2
Bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves for mitral valve replacement in patients < 70 years: an updated pairwise meta-analysis.生物瓣与机械瓣在 < 70 岁患者二尖瓣置换术中的比较:一项更新的配对荟萃分析。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Feb;72(2):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s11748-023-01956-1. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
3
Twenty-Year Experience with Surgery for Native and Prosthetic Mitral Valve Endocarditis.
二尖瓣感染性心内膜炎的自体瓣膜和人工瓣膜手术 20 年经验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 31;59(6):1060. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061060.