Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Int J Biometeorol. 2022 Aug;66(8):1699-1710. doi: 10.1007/s00484-022-02311-4. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
Although it is thought that peloid and paraffin treatments may have positive effect on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with hallux rigidus (HR), there are no comprehensive and comparative studies with a high level of evidence. We aimed to compare peloid and paraffin treatments in symptomatic hallux rigidus patients. A total of 113 patients diagnosed with HR between May 2019 and June 2021 were included in the study. After exclusion criteria, the remaining 90 patients were randomly divided into two groups: the peloid therapy group (peloid therapy + home exercise) and the paraffin therapy group (paraffin therapy + home exercise). Peloid and paraffin treatments were applied for 2 weeks (5 days a week for a total of 10 sessions). Patients were evaluated before treatment, at the end of treatment, and one month after treatment. The groups were compared in terms of pain, functional status, quality of life, and joint range of motion. In the final analysis, 40 patients in each treatment group were compared. Statistically significant improvements were achieved for all parameters at the end of treatment and at follow-up, and the treatments were found to be highly effective. As a result of the comparison, the methods were not found to be superior to each other. The present study is the first randomized study comparing peloid therapy and paraffin therapy given as an adjuncts to exercise therapy. Exercise therapy plus peloid and exercise therapy plus paraffin treatments seem to have similar effects on HR; however, controlled trials are necessary for confirmation of our results.
虽然泥疗和石蜡疗法可能对拇僵硬患者的疼痛、功能状态和生活质量有积极影响,但目前还没有综合的、具有高证据水平的比较研究。我们旨在比较泥疗和石蜡疗法对症状性拇僵硬患者的疗效。2019 年 5 月至 2021 年 6 月期间共纳入 113 例被诊断为拇僵硬的患者。排除标准后,剩余 90 例患者被随机分为两组:泥疗组(泥疗+家庭运动)和石蜡疗法组(石蜡疗法+家庭运动)。泥疗和石蜡治疗均持续 2 周(每周 5 天,共 10 次)。患者在治疗前、治疗结束时和治疗结束后 1 个月进行评估。比较两组疼痛、功能状态、生活质量和关节活动度。最终分析时,每组 40 例。治疗结束时和随访时所有参数均有显著改善,且治疗效果显著。比较结果显示,两种方法之间没有优劣之分。本研究是比较泥疗和石蜡疗法作为运动疗法辅助治疗的首个随机研究。运动疗法联合泥疗和运动疗法联合石蜡疗法似乎对拇僵硬有相似的疗效,但仍需要对照试验来证实我们的结果。