Suppr超能文献

局部麻醉用于乳房切除术而不进行重建的好处。

The Benefits of Local Anesthesia Used in Mastectomy Without Reconstruction.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Breast Surgery, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2023 Nov;89(11):4271-4280. doi: 10.1177/00031348221091959. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic has driven renewed interest in local anesthesia to reduce postoperative opioid use. Our objective was to determine if local anesthesia decreased hospital pain scores, oral morphine equivalents (OME), length of stay (LOS), and nausea/vomiting.

METHODS

Single institution retrospective study of females who underwent mastectomy without reconstruction.

RESULTS

Overall, 712 patients were included; 63 (8.8%) received bupivacaine (B), 512 (72%) liposomal bupivacaine (LB), and 137 (19%) no local. 95% were discharged on POD1. Liposomal bupivacaine use increased from 2014 to 2019. Additional factors associated with use of local regimen were surgeon and extent of axillary surgery. Fewer patients used postop opioids during their hospital stay if any local was used compared to none (76 vs 88%; 0.003). Compared to none, local had shorter mean PACU LOS (95 vs 87 min; = .02), lower mean intraoperative-OME (96 vs 106; < .001), and lower mean postoperative OME/hr (1.4 vs 1.8 = .001). Multivariable analysis (MVA) showed lower OME/hr with LB compared to B and none ( = .002); this translates to 22 mg and 30 mg of oxycodone in a 24-hr period, respectively. MVA showed lower POD1 pain scores with LB relative to none ( = .049). Local did not impact nausea/emesis.

CONCLUSION

Local anesthesia was superior to no local in several measures. However, a consistent benefit of a specific local anesthetic agent was not demonstrated (LB vs B). A prospective study is warranted to determine the optimal local regimen for this cohort and further inform clinical relevance.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物流行促使人们重新关注局部麻醉以减少术后阿片类药物的使用。我们的目的是确定局部麻醉是否可以降低医院疼痛评分、口服吗啡等效物(OME)、住院时间(LOS)和恶心/呕吐。

方法

对接受乳房切除术且未进行重建的女性进行单机构回顾性研究。

结果

总体而言,纳入 712 例患者;63 例(8.8%)接受布比卡因(B),512 例(72%)接受脂质体布比卡因(LB),137 例(19%)未接受局部麻醉。95%的患者在术后第 1 天出院。LB 的使用从 2014 年增加到 2019 年。与使用局部麻醉方案相关的其他因素是外科医生和腋窝手术的范围。与未使用局部麻醉的患者相比,如果使用了任何局部麻醉,住院期间使用术后阿片类药物的患者更少(76% vs 88%;0.003)。与未使用局部麻醉的患者相比,使用局部麻醉的患者 PACU LOS 更短(95 分钟 vs 87 分钟; =.02),术中 OME 平均值更低(96 毫克 vs 106 毫克; <.001),术后 OME/hr 平均值更低(1.4 毫克/小时 vs 1.8 毫克/小时; =.001)。多变量分析(MVA)显示,LB 与 B 和无局部麻醉相比,OME/hr 更低( =.002);这意味着在 24 小时内分别需要 22 毫克和 30 毫克羟考酮。MVA 显示 LB 相对于无局部麻醉的 POD1 疼痛评分更低( =.049)。局部麻醉不会影响恶心/呕吐。

结论

局部麻醉在多个方面优于无局部麻醉。然而,并未证明特定局部麻醉剂具有一致的优势(LB 与 B)。需要进行前瞻性研究以确定该队列的最佳局部方案,并进一步告知临床相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验