Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Jul;13(14):2057-2063. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14528. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are recommended as first-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations. The sequential use of different EGFR-TKIs has been reported to demonstrate improvement in overall survival of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. There are limited reports on comparisons between regimens with first-line use of afatinib, gefitinib or erlotinib, followed by osimertinib upon disease progression with acquired T790M mutation.
A retrospective cohort study of Chinese patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who received first-line gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib treatment, followed by osimertinib upon disease progression with acquired T790M mutation, was conducted. The differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line EGFR-TKI (PFS1) and time to second objective disease progression (PFS2) were compared among patients on different first-line EGFR-TKIs.
Among 155 patients, 101 (65.2%), 38 (24.5%) and 16 (10.3%) patients were on first-line gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib, respectively. Patients treated with afatinib in the first-line setting had significantly longer OS compared with those on gefitinib or erlotinib, while the PFS1 and PFS2 were longer for patients on afatinib but did not reach statistical significance.
First-line afatinib, followed by osimertinib upon disease progression with T790M mutation, demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to that using other EGFR-TKI in the first-line setting.
表皮生长因子受体-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)被推荐用于具有敏感 EGFR 突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的一线治疗。据报道,序贯使用不同的 EGFR-TKI 可改善具有 EGFR 突变的 NSCLC 患者的总生存期。关于一线使用阿法替尼、吉非替尼或厄洛替尼,然后在获得 T790M 突变后疾病进展时使用奥希替尼的方案比较,报告有限。
对接受一线吉非替尼、厄洛替尼或阿法替尼治疗,然后在获得 T790M 突变后疾病进展时使用奥希替尼的中国转移性 NSCLC 患者的回顾性队列研究。比较了不同一线 EGFR-TKI(PFS1)和二线客观疾病进展时间(PFS2)下的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)差异。
在 155 名患者中,101 名(65.2%)、38 名(24.5%)和 16 名(10.3%)患者分别接受了一线吉非替尼、厄洛替尼或阿法替尼治疗。一线使用阿法替尼的患者 OS 明显长于吉非替尼或厄洛替尼,而 PFS1 和 PFS2 更长,但未达到统计学意义。
一线阿法替尼,然后在 T790M 突变后疾病进展时使用奥希替尼,与一线使用其他 EGFR-TKI 相比,OS 显著延长。