• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用当前健康远程监测平台的 COVID-19 虚拟临床研究参与者体验:案例研究与定性分析

Participant Experiences of a COVID-19 Virtual Clinical Study Using the Current Health Remote Monitoring Platform: Case Study and Qualitative Analysis.

作者信息

Pugmire Juliana, Lever Taylor Jessie, Wilkes Matt, Wolfberg Adam, Zahradka Nicole

机构信息

Current Health Ltd, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Current Health Inc, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 5;6(7):e37567. doi: 10.2196/37567.

DOI:10.2196/37567
PMID:35671408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9258733/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals with a positive viral test were enrolled in a study, within 48 hours, to remotely monitor their vital signs to characterize disease progression and recovery. A virtual trial design was adopted to reduce risks to participants and the research community in a study titled Risk Stratification and Early Alerting Regarding COVID-19 Hospitalization (RiskSEARCH). The Food and Drug Administration-cleared Current Health platform with a wearable device is a continuous remote patient monitoring technology that supports hospital-at-home care and is used as a data collection tool. Enrolled participants wore the Current Health wearable device continuously for up to 30 days and took a daily symptom survey via a tablet that was provided. A qualitative substudy was conducted in parallel to better understand virtual trial implementation, including barriers and facilitators for participants.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators of the user experience of interacting with a virtual care platform and research team, while participating in a fully virtual study using qualitative and quantitative data.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted to understand participants' experience of participating in a virtual study during a global pandemic. The schedule included their experience of enrollment and their interactions with equipment and study staff. A total of 3 RiskSEARCH participants were interviewed over telephone, and transcriptions were inductively coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes were mapped onto the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify and describe the factors that influenced study adherence. Quantitative metrics, including adherence to wearable and scheduled tasks collected as part of the RiskSEARCH main study, were paired with the interviews to present an overall picture of participation.

RESULTS

All participants exceeded our definition of a fully adherent participant and reported that participation was feasible and had a low burden. The symptoms progressively resolved during the trial. Inductive thematic analysis identified 13 main themes from the interview data, which were deductively mapped onto 11 of the 14 TDF domains, highlighting barriers and facilitators for each.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants in the RiskSEARCH substudy showed high levels of adherence and engagement throughout participation. Although participants experienced some challenges in setting up and maintaining the Current Health kit (eg, charging devices), they reported feeling that the requirements of participation were both reasonable and realistic. We demonstrated that the TDF can be used for inductive thematic analysis. We anticipate expanding this work in future virtual studies and trials to identify barriers and enabling factors for implementation.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/430b/9258733/320e1dc9917c/formative_v6i7e37567_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/430b/9258733/320e1dc9917c/formative_v6i7e37567_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/430b/9258733/320e1dc9917c/formative_v6i7e37567_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,病毒检测呈阳性的个体在48小时内被纳入一项研究,以远程监测他们的生命体征,从而描述疾病的进展和康复情况。在一项名为“关于新冠住院的风险分层与早期预警”(RiskSEARCH)的研究中,采用了虚拟试验设计,以降低对参与者和研究群体的风险。经美国食品药品监督管理局批准的带有可穿戴设备的Current Health平台是一种持续的远程患者监测技术,可支持居家住院护理,并用作数据收集工具。登记的参与者连续30天佩戴Current Health可穿戴设备,并通过提供的平板电脑进行每日症状调查。同时开展了一项定性子研究,以更好地了解虚拟试验的实施情况,包括参与者面临的障碍和促进因素。

目的

本研究旨在利用定性和定量数据,了解在参与一项完全虚拟的研究时,与虚拟护理平台和研究团队互动的用户体验中的障碍和促进因素。

方法

进行了半结构化访谈,以了解参与者在全球大流行期间参与虚拟研究的体验。访谈内容包括他们的入组体验以及与设备和研究人员的互动。通过电话对3名RiskSEARCH参与者进行了访谈,并对访谈记录进行归纳编码,采用主题分析法进行分析。将主题映射到理论领域框架(TDF)上,以识别和描述影响研究依从性的因素。将作为RiskSEARCH主要研究一部分收集的包括可穿戴设备依从性和预定任务依从性在内的定量指标与访谈结果相结合,以呈现参与情况的全貌。

结果

所有参与者都超出了我们对完全依从参与者的定义,并表示参与是可行的,且负担较轻。在试验期间症状逐渐缓解。归纳主题分析从访谈数据中确定了13个主要主题,这些主题被演绎映射到14个TDF领域中的11个,突出了每个领域的障碍和促进因素。

结论

RiskSEARCH子研究的参与者在整个参与过程中表现出高度的依从性和参与度。尽管参与者在设置和维护Current Health套件(如充电设备)方面遇到了一些挑战,但他们表示觉得参与要求既合理又现实。我们证明了TDF可用于归纳主题分析。我们预计在未来的虚拟研究和试验中扩展这项工作,以确定实施的障碍和促成因素。

相似文献

1
Participant Experiences of a COVID-19 Virtual Clinical Study Using the Current Health Remote Monitoring Platform: Case Study and Qualitative Analysis.使用当前健康远程监测平台的 COVID-19 虚拟临床研究参与者体验:案例研究与定性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 5;6(7):e37567. doi: 10.2196/37567.
2
Deployment of an End-to-End Remote, Digitalized Clinical Study Protocol in COVID-19: Process Evaluation.在新冠肺炎疫情中部署端到端远程数字化临床研究方案:过程评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 29;6(7):e37832. doi: 10.2196/37832.
3
Barriers to and Facilitators of Using Remote Measurement Technology in the Long-Term Monitoring of Individuals With ADHD: Interview Study.注意力缺陷多动障碍患者长期监测中使用远程测量技术的障碍与促进因素:访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 30;7:e44126. doi: 10.2196/44126.
4
Hospital Staff Perspectives on the Drivers and Challenges in Implementing a Virtual Rehabilitation Ward: Qualitative Study.医院员工对实施虚拟康复病房的驱动力和挑战的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jun 27;7:e54774. doi: 10.2196/54774.
5
Barriers to and Facilitators of Key Stakeholders Influencing Successful Digital Implementation of Remote Monitoring Solutions: Mixed Methods Analysis.影响远程监测解决方案成功数字化实施的主要利益相关者的障碍和促进因素:混合方法分析。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 6;11:e49769. doi: 10.2196/49769.
6
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
7
Patient and caregiver perspectives on virtual care: a patient-oriented qualitative study.患者和照护者对虚拟医疗的看法:一项以患者为导向的定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Mar 1;10(1):E165-E172. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210065. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
8
"If I want to be able to keep going, I must be active." Exploring older adults' perspectives of remote physical activity supports: a mixed-methods study.如果我想保持活力,我必须积极活动。探索老年人对远程体育活动支持的观点:一项混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 24;12:1328492. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1328492. eCollection 2024.
9
Exploring the experiences of adults with stroke in virtual community-based stroke programs: a qualitative descriptive study.探索虚拟社区为基础的中风项目中成年中风患者的体验:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 7;24(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11043-7.
10
Exploring Patient Advisors' Perceptions of Virtual Care Across Canada: Qualitative Phenomenological Study.探索加拿大各地患者顾问对虚拟护理的看法:定性现象学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 23;25:e45215. doi: 10.2196/45215.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods and perceptions of success for patient recruitment in decentralized clinical studies.分散式临床研究中患者招募的方法与成功认知
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 6;7(1):e232. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.643. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Promoting inclusion in clinical trials-a rapid review of the literature and recommendations for action.促进临床试验中的包容性——文献快速回顾及行动建议。
Trials. 2021 Dec 4;22(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05849-7.
2
Use of connected digital products in clinical research following the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials.新冠疫情后临床研究中使用联网数字产品:临床试验综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 22;11(6):e047341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047341.
3
COVID-19 pandemic: A review of the global lockdown and its far-reaching effects.
新冠疫情大流行:对全球封锁及其深远影响的综述。
Sci Prog. 2021 Apr-Jun;104(2):368504211019854. doi: 10.1177/00368504211019854.
4
Online Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在线临床试验患者招募:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 4;22(11):e22179. doi: 10.2196/22179.
5
Wearable sensor data and self-reported symptoms for COVID-19 detection.可穿戴传感器数据和自我报告症状用于 COVID-19 检测。
Nat Med. 2021 Jan;27(1):73-77. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1123-x. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting.远程开展研究的电子知情同意:当前实践的回顾及使用电子知情同意的关键建议
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Nov;143:104271. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104271. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
7
Digitizing clinical trials.临床试验数字化。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jul 31;3:101. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0302-y. eCollection 2020.
8
Coronavirus shuts down trials of drugs for multiple other diseases.冠状病毒导致针对多种其他疾病的药物试验暂停。
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7801):15-16. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00889-6.
9
Virtual Clinical Trials: Perspectives in Dermatology.虚拟临床试验:皮肤科视角。
Dermatology. 2020;236(4):375-382. doi: 10.1159/000506418. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
10
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.