Suppr超能文献

医学生对麻醉下盆腔检查伦理的看法:一项多机构研究✰。

Medical Student Perspectives on the Ethics of Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia: A Multi-Institutional Study✰.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov-Dec;79(6):1413-1421. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.015. Epub 2022 Jun 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pelvic examinations under anesthesia (EUAs) are routine components of gynecologic surgery and often used to educate students about female pelvic anatomy. This multi-institutional survey study aims to describe students' experiences with conducting educational pelvic EUAs and their attitudes around the ethics of informed consent for these exams.

DESIGN

An anonymous survey of Likert and open-text response questions about institutions' practices around educational pelvic EUAs was sent to medical students.

SETTING

Medical schools included Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.

PARTICIPANTS

A total 305 medical students who had completed their obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clerkship between June 2019 and March 2020 filled out the survey (33% response rate).

RESULTS

Overall, 84% of students performed at least 1 pelvic EUA during their clerkship. Of the 42% (142) of students that observed patient informed consent processes most or every time, 67% reported they never or rarely witnessed an explicit explanation that a medical student may perform a pelvic EUA. Analysis of open-text responses found that students wanted to uphold patient autonomy but felt they did not have the personal autonomy to object to performing pelvic EUAs that they believed were unconsented. They faced significant emotional distress when consent processes were at odds with their personal ethos and professional ethical norms. Students favored more standardized and explicit patient consent processes for educational pelvic EUAs.

CONCLUSIONS

While students regularly perform pelvic EUAs, their involvement is inconsistently disclosed to patients, causing significant distress to students and risking erosion of students' attitudes about upholding patient autonomy and informed consent. Medical institutions must develop consistent, ethical, and patient-centered processes for trainee disclosure around pelvic EUAs.

摘要

目的

在麻醉下进行盆腔检查(EUAs)是妇科手术的常规组成部分,常用于向学生传授女性盆腔解剖学知识。这项多机构调查研究旨在描述学生在进行教育性盆腔 EUAs 方面的经验,以及他们对这些检查知情同意伦理的态度。

设计

向医学生发送了一份关于机构在教育性盆腔 EUAs 方面做法的匿名调查,内容为利克特量表和开放性文本回答问题。

地点

包括范德比尔特大学医学院、印第安纳大学医学院、埃默里大学医学院、新墨西哥大学医学院、梅哈里医学院和布朗大学沃伦·阿尔珀特医学院在内的多所医学院校。

参与者

共有 305 名在 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 3 月期间完成妇产科实习的医学生填写了这份调查(回应率为 33%)。

结果

总体而言,84%的学生在实习期间至少进行了 1 次盆腔 EUA。在 42%(142 名)的学生中,他们观察到患者知情同意过程的大部分或每次都进行了观察,其中 67%的学生报告称,他们从未或很少目睹过对学生可能进行盆腔 EUA 的明确解释。对开放性文本回复的分析发现,学生希望维护患者自主权,但他们感到自己没有个人自主权来反对他们认为未经同意的盆腔 EUA。当同意过程与他们的个人伦理和职业道德规范不一致时,他们会感到巨大的痛苦。学生赞成为教育性盆腔 EUAs 制定更标准化和明确的患者同意程序。

结论

尽管学生经常进行盆腔 EUAs,但他们的参与情况并未向患者明确披露,这给学生带来了巨大的困扰,并有可能侵蚀学生维护患者自主权和知情同意的态度。医疗机构必须为培训生围绕盆腔 EUAs 的披露制定一致、合乎伦理和以患者为中心的程序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验