• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

垂体后叶素注射后超声引导刮宫联合宫腔镜电切术与甲氨蝶呤化疗后宫腔镜电切术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效比较

Comparison of efficacies between ultrasound-guided curettage combined with hysteroscopic electro-resection after injection of pituitrin and hysteroscopic electro-resection after methotrexate chemotherapy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.

作者信息

Liu Ting, Xu Xiaoqin

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):3041-3047. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2081793. Epub 2022 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1080/01443615.2022.2081793
PMID:35672873
Abstract

To compare the efficacies between ultrasound-guided curettage combined with hysteroscopic electro-resection after injection of pituitrin and hysteroscopic electro-resection after methotrexate chemotherapy in the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). 60 patients with CSP admitted to our hospital were selected as the study subjects, and divided into observation group ( 35) and control group ( = 25) in accordance with the therapeutic options. The observation group was treated with ultrasound-guided curettage combined with hysteroscopic electro-resection after injection of pituitrin, while the control group was treated with hysteroscopic electro-resection after methotrexate chemotherapy. The observation group was superior to the control group in the amount of intraoperative haemorrhage, in-hospital costs, and postoperative time to control vaginal haemorrhage, time to return to a normal serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) level. The observation group had a lower incidence rate of adverse reactions (5.71% vs. 28.00%,  < .05) and a higher first-attempt success rate for treatment (85.71% vs. 84.00%,  > .05) compared with the control group. Ultrasound-guided curettage combined with hysteroscopic electro-resection after injection of pituitrin, exhibiting a higher efficacy, can more effectively shorten the postoperative recovery, reduce adverse reactions, and improve the postoperative quality of life in patients with CSP. IMPACT STATEMENT Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), a rare form of ectopic pregnancy where the fertilised egg is implanted in the muscle or fibrous tissue of the scar after a previous caesarean section (CS), is a long-term complication of CS that may be life-threatening for parturients. Some therapies have been used to treat CSP, such as uterine artery embolisation and uterine artery embolisation chemotherapy combined with curettage, but the potential adverse effects may affect the ovarian reserve and even affecting the fertility of patients. This study showed that ultrasound-guided curettage combined with hysteroscopic electro-resection after injection of pituitrin, exhibiting a higher efficacy, can more effectively shorten the postoperative recovery, reduce adverse reactions, and improve the postoperative quality of life in patients with CSP. The findings of this study may provide some references for the clinical practitioners and further research and may contribute to the treatment of CSP.

摘要

比较垂体后叶素注射后超声引导下刮宫联合宫腔镜电切术与甲氨蝶呤化疗后宫腔镜电切术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的疗效。选取我院收治的60例CSP患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方案分为观察组(35例)和对照组(25例)。观察组采用垂体后叶素注射后超声引导下刮宫联合宫腔镜电切术治疗,对照组采用甲氨蝶呤化疗后宫腔镜电切术治疗。观察组在术中出血量、住院费用、术后阴道出血控制时间、血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)水平恢复正常时间方面均优于对照组。与对照组相比,观察组不良反应发生率较低(5.71% vs. 28.00%,P<0.05),首次治疗成功率较高(85.71% vs. 84.00%,P>0.05)。垂体后叶素注射后超声引导下刮宫联合宫腔镜电切术疗效较高,能更有效地缩短术后恢复时间,减少不良反应,提高CSP患者术后生活质量。影响声明剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)是一种罕见的异位妊娠形式,受精卵在前次剖宫产(CS)后植入瘢痕的肌肉或纤维组织中,是CS的一种长期并发症,对产妇可能有生命危险。一些疗法已被用于治疗CSP,如子宫动脉栓塞术和子宫动脉栓塞化疗联合刮宫术,但潜在的不良反应可能影响卵巢储备,甚至影响患者的生育能力。本研究表明,垂体后叶素注射后超声引导下刮宫联合宫腔镜电切术疗效较高,能更有效地缩短术后恢复时间,减少不良反应,提高CSP患者术后生活质量。本研究结果可为临床医生和进一步研究提供一些参考,可能有助于CSP的治疗。

相似文献

1
Comparison of efficacies between ultrasound-guided curettage combined with hysteroscopic electro-resection after injection of pituitrin and hysteroscopic electro-resection after methotrexate chemotherapy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.垂体后叶素注射后超声引导刮宫联合宫腔镜电切术与甲氨蝶呤化疗后宫腔镜电切术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效比较
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):3041-3047. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2081793. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
2
Hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial.宫腔镜切除术与超声引导下扩张刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠的随机临床试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;229(4):437.e1-437.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.038. Epub 2023 May 3.
3
A retrospective comparative study evaluating the efficacy of adding intra-arterial methotrexate infusion to uterine artery embolisation followed by curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy.一项回顾性比较研究,评估在子宫动脉栓塞后刮宫术基础上加用动脉内甲氨蝶呤灌注治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 May;297(5):1205-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4686-8. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
4
Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy.非输卵管异位妊娠的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD011174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011174.pub2.
5
Therapeutic effects of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) and methotrexate (MTX) conservative therapy used in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)保守治疗用于剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Apr;293(4):819-23. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3881-0. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
6
A comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of caesarean scar pregnancy.高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的比较
Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32(2):144-50. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1104733. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
7
Comparing the clinical efficacy of three surgical methods for cesarean scar pregnancy.比较三种剖宫产瘢痕妊娠手术方法的临床疗效。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 May 17;23(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02415-y.
8
Pituitrin Injection before Hysteroscopic Curettage for Treating Type I Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in Comparison with Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Study.宫腔镜刮宫术前垂体后叶素注射与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗Ⅰ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的对比:一项回顾性研究
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Jun;73(3):229-234. doi: 10.1007/s13224-022-01724-w. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
9
[Therapeutic effect of hysteroscopic surgery in treatment of small mass of caesarean scar pregnancy].宫腔镜手术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠小肿块的疗效观察
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;49(1):14-7.
10
Pituitrin local injection versus uterine artery embolization in the management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study.垂体后叶素局部注射与子宫动脉栓塞术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的回顾性队列研究
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 May;47(5):1711-1718. doi: 10.1111/jog.14720. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome Reporting in Studies Investigating Treatment for Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠治疗研究的结果报告:一项系统评价
BJOG. 2025 Feb;132(3):278-287. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17989. Epub 2024 Nov 7.