Suppr超能文献

剪切应力的体外分析:CAD 铣削与粘结义齿牙的打印义齿基托树脂对比

In Vitro Analysis of Shear Stress: CAD Milled vs Printed Denture Base Resins with Bonded Denture Tooth.

作者信息

Kane Brittany, Shah Kumar C

机构信息

Private Practice, Los Angeles, CA.

UCLA School of Dentistry, Advanced Prosthodontics, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2023 Apr;32(S1):29-37. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13552. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

As the fabrication of computer-aided design (CAD) milled and 3D printed denture base resins with bonded denture teeth increase in popularity, there is a need for research comparing the shear bond stress of milled and printed denture base resins with bonded denture teeth to that of a conventional heat processed denture base.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Denture base resin specimens (n = 9) were fabricated according to manufacturers' instructions using a novel test design. Two milled (Ivobase CAD PMMA, Ivoclar Vivadent and Polident PMMA, Polident Dental) and two 3D printed (Denture Base LP Resin, Formlabs and Lucitone Digital Print, Dentsply Sirona) materials were used. Conventional heat processed polymethylmethacrylate was used as the control (Lucitone 199, Dentsply Sirona). Denture teeth (VITA Vitapan XL T44, #8, VITA Zahnfabrik) were bonded to their respective bases using denture tooth bonding agent (Ivobase CAD bonding system, Ivoclar). Specimens were aged in water for 600 hours at 37°C and loaded until failure in a Universal testing machine. Shear bond stress was calculated. All specimens were evaluated for mode of failure and select specimens under scanning electron microscope and vertical scanning interferometry. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (IBM SPSS) and fracture analysis performed.

RESULTS

Shear stress was highest for the heat processed control (mean = 180 N ±26.76) and Polident test groups (mean = 180 N ± 34.90). Milled specimens were not significantly different from the control (p = 0.076 for IvoBase CAD and 1.00 for Polident), while the printed groups were significantly different from the control (p = 0.012 for Formlabs Denture Base Resin and p = 0.00 for Carbon Lucitone Digital Print). Milled denture base resins performed similarly to heat processed denture base resin and better than 3D printed denture bases.

CONCLUSION

For complete denture wearers, all resin materials used in this study may be clinically acceptable, as the sheer stress for all groups was higher than the reported maximum biting force of complete denture patients. However, for implant retained prostheses, the incorporation of additional retentive features should be considered when bonding denture teeth to printed bases. More research is needed to evaluate methods to increase the bond strength of denture teeth to printed denture base resins.

摘要

目的

随着计算机辅助设计(CAD)铣削和3D打印的带有粘结义齿牙的义齿基托树脂的制作越来越受欢迎,有必要开展研究,比较铣削和打印的带有粘结义齿牙的义齿基托树脂与传统热加工义齿基托的剪切粘结应力。

材料与方法

按照制造商的说明,采用一种新颖的测试设计制作义齿基托树脂样本(n = 9)。使用了两种铣削材料(Ivoclar Vivadent公司的Ivobase CAD PMMA和Polident Dental公司的Polident PMMA)以及两种3D打印材料(Formlabs公司的Denture Base LP Resin和登士柏西诺德公司的Lucitone Digital Print)。传统热加工聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯用作对照(登士柏西诺德公司的Lucitone 199)。使用义齿牙粘结剂(Ivoclar公司的Ivobase CAD粘结系统)将义齿牙(维他公司的VITA Vitapan XL T44,#8)粘结到各自的基托上。样本在37°C的水中老化600小时,然后在万能试验机上加载直至破坏。计算剪切粘结应力。对所有样本进行破坏模式评估,并选择部分样本进行扫描电子显微镜和垂直扫描干涉测量。数据采用单因素方差分析,随后进行Tukey检验(IBM SPSS软件),并进行断裂分析。

结果

热加工对照组(平均值 = 180 N ±26.76)和Polident测试组(平均值 = 180 N ± 34.90)的剪切应力最高。铣削样本与对照组无显著差异(IvoBase CAD组p = 0.076,Polident组p = 1.00),而打印组与对照组有显著差异(Formlabs义齿基托树脂组p = 0.012,登士柏西诺德公司的Carbon Lucitone Digital Print组p = 0.00)。铣削义齿基托树脂的性能与热加工义齿基托树脂相似,且优于3D打印义齿基托。

结论

对于全口义齿佩戴者,本研究中使用的所有树脂材料在临床上可能都是可接受的,因为所有组的剪切应力均高于报道的全口义齿患者的最大咬合力。然而,对于种植体支持的修复体,在将义齿牙粘结到打印基托上时,应考虑加入额外的固位特征。需要更多研究来评估提高义齿牙与打印义齿基托树脂粘结强度的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验