Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Now School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 8;22(1):758. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07971-x.
Community-based multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) are the most common means to encourage health and social care service integration in England yet are rarely studied or directly observed. This paper reports on two rounds of non-participant observations of community-based multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meetings in two localities, as part of an evaluation of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers Programme. We sought to understand how MDT meetings coordinate care and identify their 'added value' over bilateral discussions.
Two rounds of structured non-participant observations of 11 MDTs (28 meetings) in an inner city and mixed urban-rural area in England (June 2019-February 2020), using a group analysis approach.
Despite diverse settings, attendance and caseloads, MDTs adopted similar processes of case management: presentation; information seeking/sharing; narrative construction; solution seeking; decision-making and task allocation. Patient-centredness was evident but scope to strengthen 'patient-voice' exists. MDTs were hampered by information governance rules and lack of interoperability between patient databases. Meetings were characterised by mutual respect and collegiality with little challenge. Decision-making appeared non-hierarchical, often involving dyads or triads of professionals. 'Added value' lay in: rapid patient information sharing; better understanding of contributing agencies' services; planning strategies for patients that providers had struggled to find the right way to engage satisfactorily; and managing risk and providing mutual support in stressful cases.
More attention needs to be given to removing barriers to information sharing, creating scope for constructive challenge between staff and deciding when to remove cases from the caseload.
以社区为基础的多学科团队(MDT)是鼓励英国卫生和社会保健服务整合的最常见手段,但很少对其进行研究或直接观察。本文报告了作为综合护理和支持先锋计划评估的一部分,对两个地方的社区为基础的多学科团队(MDT)会议进行的两轮非参与式观察。我们试图了解 MDT 会议如何协调护理,并确定其相对于双边讨论的“附加值”。
2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 2 月,在英格兰的一个内城和混合城乡地区,使用群组分析方法,对 11 个 MDT(28 次会议)进行了两轮非参与式结构性观察。
尽管环境、出席人数和病例量各不相同,但 MDT 采用了类似的病例管理流程:介绍、信息寻求/共享、叙述构建、解决方案寻求、决策和任务分配。以患者为中心的方法显而易见,但增强“患者声音”的空间仍然存在。MDT 受到信息治理规则和患者数据库之间缺乏互操作性的阻碍。会议的特点是相互尊重和协作,几乎没有挑战。决策似乎没有层次结构,通常涉及专业人员的二人组或三人组。“附加值”在于:快速共享患者信息、更好地了解各机构服务、为提供者难以找到合适方法令人满意地参与的患者制定策略、以及在压力情况下管理风险和提供相互支持。
需要更加关注消除信息共享的障碍,为员工之间的建设性挑战创造空间,并决定何时将病例从病例量中删除。