Suppr超能文献

儿童人群中藏毛窦疾病的微创治疗:两种技术的比较。

Minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease in a paediatric population: comparison of two techniques.

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2022 Dec;92(12):3288-3292. doi: 10.1111/ans.17838. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pilonidal disease (PD) is a common and debilitating inflammatory condition with significant impact on quality of life. Minimally invasive techniques (MIT) have shown promising results comparing to traditional excision. Herein we present a comparison of two MIT techniques -sinusectomy (SE) and pit-picking plus laser ablation (PPL).

METHODS

All cases of paediatric PD treated by PPL and SE at our center between August 2018 and August 2020 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

One-hundred and six patients were included, with a median age of 16 years (IQR 15-16). PPL was the procedure of choice in 36 patients (34%) and the remaining underwent SE (66%). Median healing time was significantly lower in SE group (20 days), comparing to PPL (30 days) (p = 0.002). Early healing failure occurred more frequently in the PPL group (p = 0.003). Recurrence rate was similar between groups - PPL 17% versus SE 16% (p = 0.89). Overall complication rate was 9% and was significantly higher in PPL (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

MIT techniques are promising solutions in PD treatment. Although similarly easy and fast to perform, SE technique showed better healing profile and lower complication rate but no significant difference on recurrence rates was observed.

摘要

背景

藏毛窦病(PD)是一种常见且使人虚弱的炎症性疾病,对生活质量有重大影响。微创技术(MIT)与传统切除术相比已显示出良好的效果。在此,我们比较了两种 MIT 技术 - 窦切除术(SE)和挖除加激光消融(PPL)。

方法

回顾性分析了 2018 年 8 月至 2020 年 8 月在我们中心接受 PPL 和 SE 治疗的所有小儿 PD 病例。

结果

共纳入 106 例患者,中位年龄为 16 岁(IQR 15-16)。PPL 是 36 例患者(34%)的首选治疗方法,其余患者接受 SE(66%)。SE 组的中位愈合时间明显短于 PPL 组(20 天)(p=0.002)。PPL 组早期愈合失败的发生率更高(p=0.003)。两组的复发率相似 - PPL 为 17%,SE 为 16%(p=0.89)。总并发症发生率为 9%,PPL 组明显更高(p=0.03)。

结论

MIT 技术是 PD 治疗的有前途的方法。尽管 SE 技术同样易于操作且快速,但 SE 技术显示出更好的愈合情况和更低的并发症发生率,但在复发率方面没有观察到显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验