• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胎盘早剥:评估风险因素随时间的变化趋势。

Placental abruption: assessing trends in risk factors over time.

作者信息

Schur Erga, Baumfeld Yael, Rotem Reut, Weintraub Adi Y, Pariente Gali

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, POB 151, 84101, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, affiliated with the Hebrew University Medical School of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;306(5):1547-1554. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06638-6. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-022-06638-6
PMID:35678872
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate changes in the independent contribution of different risk factors for placental abruption over time.

METHODS

In this retrospective nested case-control study, trends of change in ORs for known risk factors for placental abruption occurring in three consecutive 8-year intervals were compared. A univariate assessment of factors associated with placental abruption and two multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify independent risk factors for placental abruption. Trends of change in the incidence and specific contribution of various risk factors were compared along the study time-period.

RESULTS

During the study period, 295,946 pregnancies met the inclusion criteria; of these, 2170 (0.73%) were complicated with placental abruption. Using logistic regression models, previous cesarean delivery, in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy, hypertensive disorders, polyhydramnios, and inadequate prenatal care were recognized as independent risk factors for placental abruption. While the relative contribution of IVF pregnancy and polyhydramnios to the overall risk for abruption decreased over the course of the study, previous cesarean delivery became a stronger contributor for placental abruption.

CONCLUSION

In our study, a change over time in the specific contribution of different risk factors for placental abruption has been demonstrated.

摘要

目的

评估不同胎盘早剥风险因素的独立作用随时间的变化。

方法

在这项回顾性巢式病例对照研究中,比较了连续三个8年期间胎盘早剥已知风险因素的比值比(OR)变化趋势。对与胎盘早剥相关的因素进行单因素评估,并构建两个多变量逻辑回归模型以确定胎盘早剥的独立风险因素。比较了研究期间各风险因素发生率和具体作用的变化趋势。

结果

在研究期间,295,946例妊娠符合纳入标准;其中,2170例(0.73%)并发胎盘早剥。使用逻辑回归模型,既往剖宫产、体外受精(IVF)妊娠、高血压疾病、羊水过多和产前检查不足被确认为胎盘早剥的独立风险因素。在研究过程中,IVF妊娠和羊水过多对胎盘早剥总体风险的相对作用降低,而既往剖宫产成为胎盘早剥的更强危险因素。

结论

在我们的研究中,已证明胎盘早剥不同风险因素的具体作用随时间发生了变化。

相似文献

1
Placental abruption: assessing trends in risk factors over time.胎盘早剥:评估风险因素随时间的变化趋势。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;306(5):1547-1554. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06638-6. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
2
The association between polyhydramnios and the risk of placenta abruption: a meta-analysis.羊水过多与胎盘早剥风险的关系:一项荟萃分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Sep;33(17):3035-3040. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1566898. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
3
Identifying risk factors for placental abruption in subsequent pregnancy without a history of placental abruption.识别既往无胎盘早剥史的孕妇再次发生胎盘早剥的危险因素。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 May;161(2):406-411. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14446. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Time trends in placenta-mediated pregnancy complications after assisted reproductive technology in the Nordic countries.北欧国家辅助生殖技术后胎盘介导的妊娠并发症的时间趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):226.e1-226.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.030. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
Comparison of maternal risk factors between placental abruption and placenta previa.胎盘早剥与前置胎盘产妇危险因素的比较。
Am J Perinatol. 2009 Apr;26(4):279-86. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103156. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
6
[Analysis of risk factors for uteroplacental apoplexy complicating placental abruption].胎盘早剥并发子宫胎盘卒中的危险因素分析
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;43(8):593-6.
7
Risk factors for cerebral palsy in neonates due to placental abruption.胎盘早剥所致新生儿脑瘫的危险因素。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Jan;47(1):159-166. doi: 10.1111/jog.14447. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
Analysis of 62 placental abruption cases: Risk factors and clinical outcomes.62例胎盘早剥病例分析:危险因素及临床结局
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;58(2):223-226. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.01.010.
9
[Multivariate analysis of risk factors with placental abruption in preeclampsia].[子痫前期胎盘早剥危险因素的多因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Nov;45(11):825-8.
10
Prepregnancy risk factors for placental abruption.胎盘早剥的孕前危险因素。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(1):40-4. doi: 10.1080/00016340500324241.

引用本文的文献

1
Preterm placental abruption and its association with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study.早产胎盘早剥及其与孕产妇和新生儿不良结局的关联:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 28;25(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07718-6.
2
Independent risk factors for placental abruption: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胎盘早剥的独立危险因素:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07482-7.
3
Association of Ambient Air Pollution and Temperature Exposure with Placental Abruption: A Nested Case-Control Study Based on Live Birth Registrations.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors and clinical outcome of placental abruption: a retrospective analysis.胎盘早剥的危险因素及临床结局:一项回顾性分析。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Oct;59(10):672-4.
2
Lack of prenatal care in a traditional society. Is it an obstetric hazard?传统社会中缺乏产前护理。这是一种产科风险吗?
J Reprod Med. 2001 Jul;46(7):662-8.
环境空气污染和温度暴露与胎盘早剥的关联:一项基于活产登记的巢式病例对照研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Apr;133(3-4):47013. doi: 10.1289/EHP14714. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
4
National-level assessment of gestational carrier pregnancies in the United States.美国代孕妊娠的国家级评估。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Jan;42(1):201-211. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03320-5. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
5
Risks of Placental Abruption and Preterm Delivery in Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction.辅助生殖技术患者胎盘早剥和早产的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420970. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20970.
6
Comparison of maternal neonatal outcomes of normotensive and hypertensive placental abruptions: A novel approach.正常血压胎盘早剥与高血压胎盘早剥产妇新生儿结局的比较:一种新方法。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 28;103(26):e38633. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038633.
7
Outpatient labor induction-Exploring future potential by assessing eligibility in a historical cohort.门诊引产 - 通过评估历史队列中的合格性来探索未来潜力。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Jun;103(6):1101-1111. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14799. Epub 2024 Mar 19.