School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Jun 9;16(6):e0010456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010456. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Estimating community level scabies prevalence is crucial for targeting interventions to areas of greatest need. The World Health Organisation recommends sampling at the unit of households or schools, but there is presently no standardised approach to scabies prevalence assessment. Consequently, a wide range of sampling sizes and methods have been used. As both prevalence and drivers of transmission vary across populations, there is a need to understand how sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence interact with local epidemiology to affect the accuracy of prevalence estimates.
We used a simulation-based approach to compare the efficacy of different scabies sampling strategies. First, we generated synthetic populations broadly representative of remote Australian Indigenous communities and assigned a scabies status to individuals to achieve a specified prevalence using different assumptions about scabies epidemiology. Second, we calculated an observed prevalence for different sampling methods and sizes.
The distribution of prevalence in subpopulation groups can vary substantially when the underlying scabies assignment method changes. Across all of the scabies assignment methods combined, the simple random sampling method produces the narrowest 95% confidence interval for all sample sizes. The household sampling method introduces higher variance compared to simple random sampling when the assignment of scabies includes a household-specific component. The school sampling method overestimates community prevalence when the assignment of scabies includes an age-specific component.
Our results indicate that there are interactions between transmission assumptions and surveillance strategies, emphasizing the need for understanding scabies transmission dynamics. We suggest using the simple random sampling method for estimating scabies prevalence. Our approach can be adapted to various populations and diseases.
估算社区层面的疥疮流行率对于将干预措施集中到最需要的地区至关重要。世界卫生组织建议以家庭或学校为单位进行抽样,但目前尚无标准化的疥疮流行率评估方法。因此,人们采用了各种不同的抽样规模和方法。由于流行率和传播驱动因素在不同人群中存在差异,因此需要了解用于估算疥疮流行率的抽样策略如何与当地流行病学相互作用,从而影响流行率估计的准确性。
我们使用基于模拟的方法比较了不同疥疮抽样策略的效果。首先,我们生成了大致代表澳大利亚偏远地区土著社区的合成人群,并使用不同的疥疮流行病学假设为个体分配疥疮状态,以达到特定的流行率。其次,我们计算了不同抽样方法和规模的观察流行率。
当底层疥疮分配方法发生变化时,亚人群组中的流行率分布可能会有很大差异。在所有疥疮分配方法组合中,简单随机抽样方法在所有样本规模下都产生了最窄的 95%置信区间。当疥疮的分配包括家庭特定成分时,家庭抽样方法与简单随机抽样相比会产生更高的方差。当疥疮的分配包括年龄特定成分时,学校抽样方法会高估社区流行率。
我们的结果表明,传播假设和监测策略之间存在相互作用,这强调了了解疥疮传播动态的必要性。我们建议使用简单随机抽样方法来估算疥疮流行率。我们的方法可以适应各种人群和疾病。