Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, Huangpu Road West, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510630, China.
School of Public Health, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi 712046, China.
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Mar 16;2022:1288535. doi: 10.1155/2022/1288535. eCollection 2022.
The effectiveness of antithrombotic drugs for treating sepsis is controversial. Here, we explore the association between antithrombotic therapy and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality for septic patients with peripheral vascular disease.
This retrospective cohort study uses data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III database. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to examine mortality among different groups. Cox regression and marginal structural Cox models (MSCMs) were used to adjust for confounding factors. . The final cohort from the MIMIC-III database included 776 patients, of which 701 survived and 75 perished. The anticoagulant (AC) group and the antiplatelet-anticoagulation (AC-AP) group survived better than the group without antithrombotic treatment (non-AT). The AC and AC-AP groups showed a 0.363-fold and 0.373-fold risk of ICU mortality, respectively, compared with the non-AT group when controlling for age, gender, CRRT, alcohol, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, renal failure, liver disease, INR, PT, PPT, and SpO2. Antiplatelet therapy did not reduce ICU mortality. The same trends were apparent from the MSCM. In addition, the AC-AP group exhibited a lower risk of bleeding complications.
Although the antithrombotic group (AC and AC-AP groups) demonstrated a higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score than the group without antithrombotic treatment (non-AT group), the risk of ICU mortality was lower without increasing the risk of bleeding complications. Our study further suggested that anticoagulation therapy may benefit the prognosis of septic patients with peripheral vascular disease.
抗血栓药物治疗脓毒症的疗效存在争议。本研究旨在探讨外周血管疾病合并脓毒症患者的抗血栓治疗与重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率之间的关系。
本回顾性队列研究使用了 Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care(MIMIC)-III 数据库的数据。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析比较不同组别的死亡率。采用 Cox 回归和边际结构 Cox 模型(MSCM)调整混杂因素。从 MIMIC-III 数据库中最终纳入 776 例患者,其中 701 例存活,75 例死亡。与未接受抗血栓治疗(非 AT 组)相比,抗凝(AC)组和抗血小板抗凝(AC-AP)组的生存情况更好。在校正年龄、性别、CRRT、酒精、心力衰竭、高血压、糖尿病、肥胖、肾衰竭、肝病、INR、PT、PPT 和 SpO2 等因素后,AC 组和 AC-AP 组 ICU 死亡率的风险分别降低了 0.363 倍和 0.373 倍。抗血小板治疗并未降低 ICU 死亡率。MSCM 也显示出相同的趋势。此外,AC-AP 组出血并发症的风险较低。
尽管抗血栓组(AC 组和 AC-AP 组)的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分高于未接受抗血栓治疗组(非 AT 组),但 ICU 死亡率的风险较低,且并未增加出血并发症的风险。本研究进一步提示抗凝治疗可能有益于外周血管疾病合并脓毒症患者的预后。