• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国社区实践中转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者的真实世界种族差异。

Assessing Real-World Racial Differences Among Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in US Community Practices.

机构信息

Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.

Gastroesophageal Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 May 24;10:859113. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.859113. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.859113
PMID:35685754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9171051/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Real-world data characterizing differences between African American (AA) and White women with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) are limited. Using 9 years of data collected from community practices throughout the United States, we assessed racial differences in the proportion of patients with mTNBC, and their characteristics, treatment, and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed de-identified data from 2,116 patients with mTNBC in the Flatiron Health database (January 2011 to March 2020). Characteristics and treatment patterns between AA and White patients with mTNBC were compared using descriptive statistics. OS was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Among patients with metastatic breast cancer, more AA patients (23%) had mTNBC than White patients (12%). This difference was particularly pronounced in patients who lived in the Northeast, were aged 45-65, had commercial insurance, and had initial diagnosis at stage II. AA patients were younger and more likely to have Medicaid. Clinical characteristics and first-line treatments were similar between AA and White patients. Unadjusted median OS (months) was shorter in AA (10.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.1, 11.7) vs. White patients (11.9; 95% CI: 10.9, 12.8) but not significantly different. After adjusting for potential confounders, the hazard ratio for OS was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.25) for AA vs. White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients with mTNBC was higher in AA than White mBC patients treated in community practices. Race did not show an association with OS. Both AA and White patients with mTNBC received similar treatments. OS was similarly poor in both groups, particularly in patients who had not received any documented anti-cancer treatment. Effective treatment remains a substantial unmet need for all patients with mTNBC.

摘要

目的

关于转移性三阴性乳腺癌(mTNBC)患者中,非裔美国(AA)人和白人之间差异的真实世界数据较为有限。本研究利用来自美国各地社区实践的 9 年数据,评估了 mTNBC 患者中种族差异,以及他们的特征、治疗和总生存(OS)。

方法

本回顾性研究分析了 Flatiron Health 数据库中 2116 例 mTNBC 患者的匿名数据(2011 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月)。使用描述性统计比较 AA 和白人 mTNBC 患者之间的特征和治疗模式。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型来检查 OS。

结果

在转移性乳腺癌患者中,更多的 AA 患者(23%)患有 mTNBC,而非白人患者(12%)。这种差异在居住在东北部、年龄在 45-65 岁、有商业保险且初始诊断为 II 期的患者中尤为明显。AA 患者更年轻,更可能拥有医疗补助。AA 和白人患者的临床特征和一线治疗相似。未调整的中位 OS(月)在 AA 患者中较短(10.3;95%置信区间 [CI]:9.1,11.7),而在白人患者中则较长(11.9;95% CI:10.9,12.8),但无统计学差异。调整潜在混杂因素后,AA 患者的 OS 风险比为 1.09(95% CI:0.95,1.25)。

结论

在社区实践中治疗的 mTNBC 患者中,AA 患者的比例高于白人 mBC 患者。种族与 OS 无关联。mTNBC 患者中 AA 和白人患者接受的治疗相似。两组患者的 OS 同样较差,尤其是未接受任何有记录的抗癌治疗的患者。所有 mTNBC 患者仍然存在有效治疗的巨大未满足需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/0b1d6208f24d/fpubh-10-859113-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/0c2ef0375602/fpubh-10-859113-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/ff95c562cc45/fpubh-10-859113-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/a80c0c48684e/fpubh-10-859113-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/d1c48c4f0110/fpubh-10-859113-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/0b1d6208f24d/fpubh-10-859113-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/0c2ef0375602/fpubh-10-859113-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/ff95c562cc45/fpubh-10-859113-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/a80c0c48684e/fpubh-10-859113-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/d1c48c4f0110/fpubh-10-859113-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c42c/9171051/0b1d6208f24d/fpubh-10-859113-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Real-World Racial Differences Among Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in US Community Practices.评估美国社区实践中转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者的真实世界种族差异。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 24;10:859113. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.859113. eCollection 2022.
2
Real-world effectiveness outcomes in patients diagnosed with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者的真实世界有效性结局
Future Oncol. 2021 Mar;17(8):931-941. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1021. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
3
Real-World Survival and Treatment Regimens Across First- to Third-Line Treatment for Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.晚期三阴性乳腺癌一线至三线治疗的真实世界生存情况及治疗方案
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2023 Oct 4;17:11782234231203292. doi: 10.1177/11782234231203292. eCollection 2023.
4
Current treatment landscape for patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic literature review.局部复发不可切除或转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者的当前治疗现状:系统文献回顾。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 16;21(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1210-4.
5
Clinical benefit of treatment with eribulin mesylate for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Long-term outcomes of patients treated in the US community oncology setting.甲磺酸艾瑞布林治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌的临床获益:美国社区肿瘤学环境中治疗患者的长期结局。
Cancer Med. 2018 Sep;7(9):4371-4378. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1705. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
6
Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a large-scale data analysis using the Japanese claims database.转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者的治疗模式和临床结局:基于日本理赔数据库的大规模数据分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jul;206(1):91-103. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07273-2. Epub 2024 May 5.
7
Outcome beyond third-line chemotherapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in the French ESME program.法国 ESME 项目中转移性三阴性乳腺癌三线化疗后的结局。
Breast. 2021 Apr;56:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
8
Real-world clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early relapsed triple-negative breast cancer from the ESME national cohort.ESME 全国队列研究中早期复发三阴性乳腺癌患者的真实世界临床和生存结局。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Aug;189:112935. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.023. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
9
Incidence, pattern and prognosis of brain metastases in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer.转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者脑转移的发生率、模式和预后。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 19;18(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4371-0.
10
Maintenance chemotherapy is effective in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.维持化疗对一线铂类化疗后的转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者有效。
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;9(5):3018-3027. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-578. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Treatment and Mortality Among Women With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.评估三阴性乳腺癌女性在治疗和死亡率方面的种族/民族差异。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jul 1;7(7):1016-1023. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1254.
2
Real-world effectiveness outcomes in patients diagnosed with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者的真实世界有效性结局
Future Oncol. 2021 Mar;17(8):931-941. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1021. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
3
Triple-negative breast cancer incidence in the United States: ecological correlations with area-level sociodemographics, healthcare, and health behaviors.
美国三阴性乳腺癌发病率:与地区社会人口统计学、医疗保健和健康行为的生态关联。
Breast Cancer. 2021 Jan;28(1):82-91. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01132-w. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
4
Comparative effectiveness of first-line nab-paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.一线白蛋白紫杉醇与紫杉醇单药治疗三阴性乳腺癌的疗效比较。
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Oct;8(14):1173-1185. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0077. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Update on triple-negative breast cancer disparities for the United States: A population-based study from the United States Cancer Statistics database, 2010 through 2014.美国三阴性乳腺癌差异的最新研究:基于美国癌症统计数据库的 2010 年至 2014 年的人群研究。
Cancer. 2019 Oct 1;125(19):3412-3417. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32207. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
6
Neighborhood Social Determinants of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.三阴性乳腺癌的邻里社会决定因素
Front Public Health. 2019 Feb 18;7:18. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00018. eCollection 2019.
7
Racial Disparity and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in African-American Women: A Multifaceted Affair between Obesity, Biology, and Socioeconomic Determinants.非裔美国女性中的种族差异与三阴性乳腺癌:肥胖、生物学和社会经济决定因素之间的多方面关系
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Dec 14;10(12):514. doi: 10.3390/cancers10120514.
8
Genomic analysis of racial differences in triple negative breast cancer.三阴性乳腺癌中种族差异的基因组分析。
Genomics. 2019 Dec;111(6):1529-1542. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
9
The influence of marital status and race/ethnicity on risk of mortality for triple negative breast cancer.婚姻状况和种族/民族对三阴性乳腺癌死亡率风险的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0196134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196134. eCollection 2018.
10
Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state.乳腺癌统计数据,2017 年,按州划分的死亡率种族差异。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Nov;67(6):439-448. doi: 10.3322/caac.21412. Epub 2017 Oct 3.