Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada.
Division of Palliative Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7689-7696. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07203-2. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
Dexamethasone is a commonly prescribed corticosteroid by both palliative care physicians and radiation oncologists for the treatment of metastatic cancer pain. However, clinical evidence for dexamethasone dose and efficacy is lacking, and prescribing between these different specialties may be influenced by other factors. This study investigates the dexamethasone prescriptions of palliative care physicians and radiation oncologists for cancer pain and their prescription rationales.
Palliative care physicians and radiation oncologists in British Columbia, Canada, were surveyed on their preferred dexamethasone prescription in response to 4 case vignettes of patients with metastatic cancer and asked to choose a rationale from a list of options which were then categorized as "habit-based," "results-based," or "evidence-based." Response frequencies between the specialties were compared with odds ratios.
The total daily dose and duration of dexamethasone prescriptions were similar between the specialties. Palliative care physicians were significantly more likely than radiation oncologists to prescribe a single daily dose of dexamethasone rather than a divided dose (OR 3.3 [95% CI 2.0-5.5]). This significant difference persisted when separately analyzing results at different total daily doses. Both specialties were more likely to select habit-based rationales rather than evidence-based rationales, with no significant difference between specialties.
These findings show that dexamethasone prescriptions are habit-based and that prescribing habits are different between palliative care physicians and radiation oncologists. Interventions based on these findings could potentially prevent unequal patient care. Further qualitative investigations of physician perceptions are indicated to better understand habit-based corticosteroid prescribing patterns.
地塞米松是姑息治疗医师和放射肿瘤学家常用的皮质类固醇药物,用于治疗转移性癌症疼痛。然而,地塞米松剂量和疗效的临床证据不足,不同专业之间的处方可能受到其他因素的影响。本研究调查了姑息治疗医师和放射肿瘤学家对癌症疼痛的地塞米松处方及其处方依据。
对加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的姑息治疗医师和放射肿瘤学家进行了调查,询问他们对 4 名患有转移性癌症的患者案例的首选地塞米松处方,并从一系列选项中选择一个理由,然后将这些理由分为“基于习惯”、“基于结果”或“基于证据”。比较了专业之间的反应频率与优势比。
地塞米松的总日剂量和持续时间在专业之间相似。姑息治疗医师与放射肿瘤学家相比,更有可能开单剂量地塞米松而非分剂量(比值比 3.3 [95%置信区间 2.0-5.5])。当分别分析不同总日剂量的结果时,这种显著差异仍然存在。两个专业都更倾向于选择基于习惯的理由,而不是基于证据的理由,专业之间没有显著差异。
这些发现表明地塞米松的处方是基于习惯的,而且姑息治疗医师和放射肿瘤学家的处方习惯不同。基于这些发现的干预措施可能有助于预防患者护理的不平等。进一步的定性研究医生的看法是必要的,以更好地理解基于习惯的皮质类固醇处方模式。