Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor gene rearrangements has been used as the gold standard for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for >20 years. Recently, new PCR-based technologies have emerged, such as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which could offer several methodologic advances for MRD monitoring. In the current work, qPCR and ddPCR were compared in an unbiased blinded prospective study (n = 88 measurements) and in a retrospective study with selected critical low positive samples (n = 65 measurements). The former included flow cytometry (Flow; n = 31 measurements) as a third MRD detection method. Published guidelines (qPCR) and the latest, revised evaluation criteria (ie, ddPCR, Flow) have been applied for data analysis. The prospective study shows that ddPCR outperforms qPCR with a significantly better quantitative limit of detection and sensitivity. The number of critical MRD estimates below quantitative limit was reduced by sixfold and by threefold in the retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the concordance of quantitative values between ddPCR and Flow was higher than between ddPCR and qPCR, probably because ddPCR and Flow are absolute quantification methods independent of the diagnostic sample, unlike qPCR. In summary, our data highlight the advantages of ddPCR as a more precise and sensitive technology that may be used to refine response monitoring in ALL.