Suppr超能文献

老年小鼠的食欲性学习。

Appetitive learning by old mice.

作者信息

Warren J M

出版信息

Exp Aging Res. 1986 Summer;12(2):99-105. doi: 10.1080/03610738608259444.

Abstract

Groups of C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mice, aged 100 to 700 days, were trained on 7 appetitive learning tasks in order to determine which tasks might be suitable for studies of learning by old mice. Old B6 and D2 mice were both deficient in learning a discrimination reversal and two complex maze tasks; age did not affect performance on a simple spatial discrimination by subjects from either strain. Three tasks yielded strain-specific results. Old B6, but not old D2, animals were impaired on a visual discrimination problem. On a test of latent learning, old B6 animals were superior to younger mice, but the reverse trend characterized the D2 mice. Older D2 mice were retarded on a food-seeking task; B6 mice of all ages failed this test. The deficits observed in learning by old mice are thus strain- as well as task-specific. However, the deprivation procedures of this experiment resulted in excessive mortality in the oldest groups of mice, indicating that appetitive learning is contraindicated as a method for investigating learning by old mice.

摘要

对100至700日龄的C57BL/6J(B6)和DBA/2J(D2)小鼠群体进行了7项奖赏性学习任务训练,以确定哪些任务可能适合用于老年小鼠的学习研究。老年B6和D2小鼠在学习辨别反转任务和两项复杂迷宫任务时均表现出缺陷;年龄对这两个品系的小鼠在简单空间辨别任务中的表现没有影响。有三项任务产生了品系特异性结果。老年B6小鼠(而非老年D2小鼠)在视觉辨别问题上表现受损。在一项潜在学习测试中,老年B6小鼠优于年轻小鼠,但D2小鼠呈现相反趋势。老年D2小鼠在觅食任务中表现迟缓;各年龄段的B6小鼠均未能通过该测试。因此,老年小鼠在学习中观察到的缺陷是品系特异性和任务特异性的。然而,本实验中的剥夺程序导致最年长小鼠群体的死亡率过高,这表明奖赏性学习作为研究老年小鼠学习的方法是不合适的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验