van Essen Thomas Arjan, Res Lodewijk, Schoones Jan, de Ruiter Godard, Dekkers Olaf, Maas Andrew, Peul Wilco, van der Gaag Niels Anthony
University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Haaglanden Medical Center and Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden-The Hague, Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jan;40(1-2):22-32. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0137. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
The rationale of performing surgery for acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) to reduce mortality is often compared with the self-evident effectiveness of a parachute when skydiving. Nevertheless, it is of clinical relevance to estimate the magnitude of the effectiveness of surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether surgery reduces mortality in traumatic ASDH compared with initial conservative treatment. A systematic search was performed in the databases IndexCAT, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, CENTRAL, Academic Search Premier, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and CINAHL for studies investigating ASDH treated conservatively and surgically, without restriction to publication date, describing the mortality. Cohort studies or trials with at least five patients with ASDH, clearly describing surgical, conservative treatment, or both, with the mortality at discharge, reported in English or Dutch, were eligible. The search yielded 2025 reports of which 282 were considered for full-text review. After risk of bias assessment, we included 102 studies comprising 12,287 patients. The data were synthesized using meta-analysis of absolute risks; this was conducted in random-effects models, with dramatic effect estimation in subgroups. Overall mortality in surgically treated ASDH is 48% (95% confidence interval [CI] 44-53%). Mortality after surgery for comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8) is 41% (95% CI 31-51%) in contemporary series (after 2000). Mortality after surgery for non-comatose ASDH is 12% (95% CI 4-23%). Conservative treatment is associated with an overall mortality of 35% (95% CI 22-48%) and 81% (95% CI 56-98%) when restricting to comatose patients. The absolute risk reduction is 40% (95% CI 35-45%), with a number needed to treat of 2.5 (95% CI 2.2-2.9) to prevent one death in comatose ASDH. Thus, surgery is effective to reduce mortality among comatose patients with ASDH. The magnitude of the effect is large, although the effect size may not be sufficient to overcome any bias.
通过手术治疗急性硬膜下血肿(ASDH)以降低死亡率的基本原理,常被拿来与跳伞时降落伞显而易见的有效性相比较。然而,评估手术有效性的程度具有临床相关性。本研究的目的是确定与初始保守治疗相比,手术是否能降低创伤性ASDH的死亡率。我们在IndexCAT、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、CENTRAL、Academic Search Premier、Google Scholar、ScienceDirect和CINAHL等数据库中进行了系统检索,以查找研究保守治疗和手术治疗ASDH的研究,不限出版日期,且描述了死亡率。纳入标准为队列研究或试验,至少有五例ASDH患者,清晰描述手术、保守治疗或两者情况,报告了出院时的死亡率,语言为英语或荷兰语。检索共得到2025篇报告,其中282篇被考虑进行全文审查。在进行偏倚风险评估后,我们纳入了102项研究,共12287例患者。数据采用绝对风险的荟萃分析进行综合;在随机效应模型中进行,在亚组中进行显著效应估计。手术治疗ASDH的总体死亡率为48%(95%置信区间[CI]44 - 53%)。当代系列研究(2000年以后)中,昏迷患者(格拉斯哥昏迷量表≤8)手术后的死亡率为41%(95%CI 31 - 51%)。非昏迷ASDH手术后的死亡率为12%(95%CI 4 - 23%)。保守治疗在总体上的死亡率为35%(95%CI 22 - 48%),对于昏迷患者则为81%(95%CI 56 - 98%)。绝对风险降低率为40%(95%CI 35 - 45%),在昏迷的ASDH中预防一例死亡所需治疗人数为2.5(95%CI 2.2 - 2.9)。因此,手术对于降低昏迷的ASDH患者的死亡率是有效的。尽管效应大小可能不足以克服任何偏倚,但效应程度很大。