• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经性厌食症与神经性贪食症青少年患者社会认知和心理理论的神经机制及其跨诊断比较。

Neural mechanisms underlying social recognition and theory of mind in adolescent patients with bulimia nervosa and transdiagnostic comparison with anorexia nervosa.

机构信息

Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Clinic for Obstetrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2022 Sep;30(5):486-500. doi: 10.1002/erv.2911. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1002/erv.2911
PMID:35701077
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Theory of mind (ToM) is important for social interactions and typical development and has been found to be impaired in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). Hypoactivation in frontotemporal brain regions seems to be the underlying neural mechanism in AN while whole-brain analyses in BN are lacking.

METHODS

We used the well-validated social recognition task fMRI paradigm to assess ToM in a total of 72 female adolescents (16 BN, 18 AN and 38 matched healthy controls [HC]).

RESULTS

Compared to HC , patients with BN showed hyperactivity during ToM-activity in the right frontal pole, middle temporal gyrus and left temporal pole and differed fundamentally from hypoactivation in these regions observed in patients with AN before and after short-term weight rehabilitation. Interaction and overlap analyses confirmed that similar regions were affected in opposite directions in both diseases. Hyperactivations in BN in the right middle temporal gyrus and right frontal pole were associated with clinical BN-severity markers binging and purging frequency.

DISCUSSION

The hyperactivation in BN suggest different underlying neural mechanisms for ToM compared to AN. Hyperactivity might correspond to a different but also ineffective cognitive style in patients with BN when approaching social interactions. These important transdiagnostic differences are relevant for future brain-targeted therapeutic approaches.

摘要

简介

心理理论(ToM)对于社交互动和典型发展很重要,并且已经发现厌食症(AN)和贪食症(BN)患者的心理理论受损。额叶和颞叶脑区的低激活似乎是 AN 的潜在神经机制,而 BN 的全脑分析则缺乏。

方法

我们使用经过充分验证的社会认知任务 fMRI 范式,共评估了 72 名女性青少年(16 名 BN、18 名 AN 和 38 名匹配的健康对照组[HC])的心理理论。

结果

与 HC 相比,BN 患者在心理理论活动期间表现出右侧额极、中颞叶和左侧颞极的过度活跃,与 AN 患者在短期体重康复前后观察到的这些区域的低激活有根本区别。交互和重叠分析证实,两种疾病的相似区域以相反的方向受到影响。BN 中的右侧中颞叶和右侧额极的过度活跃与 BN 临床严重程度标志物暴食和清肠频率相关。

讨论

与 AN 相比,BN 的过度活跃表明心理理论的潜在神经机制不同。过度活跃可能对应于 BN 患者在处理社交互动时的一种不同但同样无效的认知方式。这些重要的跨诊断差异对未来针对大脑的治疗方法具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Neural mechanisms underlying social recognition and theory of mind in adolescent patients with bulimia nervosa and transdiagnostic comparison with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症与神经性贪食症青少年患者社会认知和心理理论的神经机制及其跨诊断比较。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2022 Sep;30(5):486-500. doi: 10.1002/erv.2911. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
Meta-analysis of theory of mind in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A specific İmpairment of cognitive perspective taking in anorexia nervosa?神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症心理理论的荟萃分析:神经性厌食症中认知观点采择的特定损伤?
Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Aug;49(8):739-40. doi: 10.1002/eat.22572. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Empathy, mentalizing, and cognitive functioning in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症中的同理心、心理化和认知功能。
Soc Neurosci. 2020 Aug;15(4):477-488. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2020.1760131. Epub 2020 May 13.
4
Theory of mind in bulimia nervosa.神经性贪食症的心理理论。
Int J Eat Disord. 2012 Apr;45(3):377-84. doi: 10.1002/eat.20967. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
5
Neural correlates associated with processing food stimuli in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of fMRI studies.神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症患者处理食物刺激的神经相关因素:基于 fMRI 研究的激活似然估计荟萃分析。
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Oct;27(7):2309-2320. doi: 10.1007/s40519-022-01390-x. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
6
Theory of mind and central coherence in eating disorders: two sides of the same coin?心理理论和进食障碍中的中心连贯:同一枚硬币的两面?
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 30;210(3):1116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.08.051. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
7
Theory of mind in eating disorders and their relationship to clinical profile.进食障碍的心理理论及其与临床特征的关系。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2013 Nov;21(6):479-87. doi: 10.1002/erv.2247. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
8
Altered processing of rewarding and aversive basic taste stimuli in symptomatic women with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: An fMRI study.神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症有症状女性对奖赏性和厌恶性基本味觉刺激的加工改变:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Jul;90:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
9
Prefrontal Responses during Proactive and Reactive Inhibition Are Differentially Impacted by Stress in Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa.前额叶在主动性和反应性抑制过程中的反应受神经性厌食症和贪食症应激的影响存在差异。
J Neurosci. 2021 May 19;41(20):4487-4499. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2853-20.2021. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
10
An exploratory assessment of theory of mind and psychological impairment in patients with bulimia nervosa.神经性贪食症患者心理理论与心理障碍的探索性评估
Br J Psychol. 2014 Nov;105(4):509-23. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12054. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Atypical social cognition processing in bulimia nervosa: an fMRI study of patients thinking of others' mental states.神经性贪食症中的非典型社会认知加工:一项关于患者对他人心理状态思考的功能磁共振成像研究
Biopsychosoc Med. 2024 Feb 21;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13030-023-00297-y.
2
Machine learning research based on diffusion tensor images to distinguish between anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.基于扩散张量图像的机器学习研究,以区分神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 11;14:1326271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1326271. eCollection 2023.
3
Social Processing in Eating Disorders: Neuroimaging Paradigms and Research Domain Organizational Constructs.
进食障碍中的社会加工:神经影像学范式和研究领域组织构建。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022 Dec;24(12):777-788. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01395-4. Epub 2022 Nov 22.