Voigt Kristin
Institute for Health and Social Policy and Department of Philosophy, McGill University, Canada.
Public Health Ethics. 2022 Apr 29;15(1):51-63. doi: 10.1093/phe/phac006. eCollection 2022 Apr.
In several countries, governments have implemented so-called 'COVID passport' schemes, which restrict access to venues such as bars or sports events to those who are vaccinated against COVID-19 and/or exempt vaccinated individuals from public health measures such as curfews or quarantine requirements. These schemes have been the subject of a heated debate. Concerns about inequality have played an important role in the opposition to such schemes. This article highlights that determining how COVID passports affect equality requires a much more nuanced analysis than is typically assumed. I identify a range of broadly egalitarian considerations that could be affected by the introduction of COVID passport schemes. While these schemes could undermine certain aspects of equality, I argue that they could also be used to equality. The magnitude and severity of these different effects, both promoting and undermining equality, depend on how precisely these schemes are framed and the local context in which they are implemented.
在一些国家,政府实施了所谓的“新冠通行证”计划,这些计划将酒吧或体育赛事等场所的准入限制在接种了新冠疫苗的人以及/或者使接种疫苗的个人免受宵禁或检疫要求等公共卫生措施的限制。这些计划一直是激烈辩论的主题。对不平等的担忧在反对这些计划的过程中发挥了重要作用。本文强调,确定新冠通行证如何影响平等需要比通常设想的更为细致入微的分析。我指出了一系列可能受到新冠通行证计划引入影响的大致平等主义考量因素。虽然这些计划可能会破坏平等的某些方面,但我认为它们也可以被用来促进平等。这些促进和破坏平等的不同影响的程度和严重性,取决于这些计划的制定方式以及实施它们的当地背景。