Silvello L, Scarponi R, Peruzzini V, Mainella G, Luzzati A
Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1986 Sep;12(3):387-94.
After a five year experience with two models of uncemented total hip prosthesis (Lord model and Mittelmeier model), two surgical teams analysed and compared the results in 88 cases with a view to ascertaining if there were any advantages of one model over the other. This was a prospective survey recording the standard parameters of assessment commonly accepted, and was subjected to statistical analysis. The results showed no superiority of one model over the other but they have reinforced our conviction of the superiority of uncemented prostheses over the cemented type.
在对两种非骨水泥型全髋关节假体(洛德模型和米特尔迈尔模型)进行了五年的使用经验后,两个手术团队对88例病例的结果进行了分析和比较,以确定一种模型是否比另一种模型有任何优势。这是一项前瞻性调查,记录了普遍接受的标准评估参数,并进行了统计分析。结果表明,一种模型并不优于另一种模型,但它们强化了我们对于非骨水泥型假体优于骨水泥型假体的信念。