Romero-Expósito Maite, Toma-Dasu Iuliana, Dasu Alexandru
The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden.
Oncology Pathology Department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Oncol. 2022 May 31;12:892078. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.892078. eCollection 2022.
Proton therapy has the potential to provide survival and tumor control outcomes comparable and frequently superior to photon therapy. This has led to a significant concern in the medical physics community on the risk for the induction of second cancers in all patients and especially in younger patients, as they are considered more radiosensitive than adults and have an even longer expected lifetime after treatment. Thus, our purpose is to present an overview of the research carried out on the evaluation of out-of-field doses linked to second cancer induction and the prediction of this risk. Most investigations consisted of Monte Carlo simulations in passive beam facilities for clinical scenarios. These works established that equivalent doses in organs could be up to 200 mSv or 900 mSv for a brain or a craniospinal treatment, respectively. The major contribution to this dose comes from the secondary neutrons produced in the beam line elements. Few works focused on scanned-beam facilities, but available data show that, for these facilities, equivalent doses could be between 2 and 50 times lower. Patient age is a relevant factor in the dose level, especially for younger patients (by means of the size of the body) and, in addition, in the predicted risk by models (due to the age dependence of the radiosensitivity). For risks, the sex of the patient also plays an important role, as female patients show higher sensitivity to radiation. Thus, predicted risks of craniospinal irradiation can range from 8% for a 15-year-old male patient to 58% for a 2-year-old female patient, using a risk model from a radiological protection field. These values must be taken with caution due to uncertainties in risk models, and then dosimetric evaluation of stray radiation becomes mandatory in order to complement epidemiological studies and be able to model appropriate dose-response functions for this dose range. In this sense, analytical models represent a useful tool and some models have been implemented to be used for young patients. Research carried out so far confirmed that proton beam therapy reduces the out-of-field doses and second cancer risk. However, further investigations may be required in scanned-beam delivery systems.
质子治疗有可能提供与光子治疗相当且常常更优的生存和肿瘤控制效果。这在医学物理界引发了对所有患者尤其是年轻患者诱发二次癌症风险的重大担忧,因为他们被认为比成年人对辐射更敏感,且治疗后的预期寿命更长。因此,我们的目的是概述在评估与二次癌症诱发相关的野外剂量以及该风险预测方面所开展的研究。大多数研究包括在被动束流设施中针对临床场景进行的蒙特卡罗模拟。这些研究表明,对于脑部或全脑全脊髓治疗,器官中的等效剂量分别可达200毫希沃特或900毫希沃特。该剂量的主要贡献来自束流线元件中产生的次级中子。很少有研究关注扫描束流设施,但现有数据表明,对于这些设施,等效剂量可能低2至50倍。患者年龄是剂量水平的一个相关因素,特别是对于年轻患者(通过身体大小),此外,在模型预测的风险方面(由于辐射敏感性的年龄依赖性)也是如此。对于风险而言,患者性别也起着重要作用,因为女性患者对辐射表现出更高的敏感性。因此,使用放射防护领域的风险模型,全脑全脊髓照射的预测风险范围从15岁男性患者的8%到2岁女性患者的58%。由于风险模型存在不确定性,这些值必须谨慎对待,然后对杂散辐射进行剂量学评估就变得至关重要,以便补充流行病学研究,并能够为该剂量范围建立适当的剂量反应函数。从这个意义上说,分析模型是一种有用的工具,并且已经实施了一些模型用于年轻患者。迄今为止开展的研究证实,质子束治疗可降低野外剂量和二次癌症风险。然而,对于扫描束流输送系统可能需要进一步研究。