Suppr超能文献

经皮内镜下腰椎椎间融合术的技术优缺点分析及其趋势展望

[Analysis of technical advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and its trend prospect].

作者信息

Zhang Bin, Kong Qingquan, Rong Limin

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.

Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 15;36(6):653-659. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202202075.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review and evaluate the technical advantages and disadvantages and research progress of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion.

METHODS

The domestic and foreign related research literature on percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion was extensively consulted. The advantages, disadvantages, and effectiveness were summarized. And the development trend of this technology was prospected.

RESULTS

Compared with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion has less intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, better improvement of low back pain in the early stage after operation, and similar long-term effectiveness, fusion rate, and incidence of complication, but a longer learning curve. The operation time of biportal and large-channel uniportal endoscopic lumbar fusion is close to that of MIS-TLIF, but the operation time of small-channel uniportal endoscopic fusion is longer than that of MIS-TLIF.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion has the advantages of less trauma and good effectiveness, but its learning curve is long, and indications should be strictly selected for this operation. In the future, with the continuous development and complementation of various endoscopic fusion technologies, this technology will gain better application prospects.

摘要

目的

回顾和评估经皮内镜下腰椎椎间融合术的技术优缺点及研究进展。

方法

广泛查阅国内外经皮内镜下腰椎椎间融合术的相关研究文献。总结其优缺点及有效性,并对该技术的发展趋势进行展望。

结果

与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)相比,经皮内镜下腰椎椎间融合术术中及术后出血更少,术后早期腰痛改善更好,长期有效性、融合率及并发症发生率相近,但学习曲线更长。双孔道和大通道单孔道内镜下腰椎融合术的手术时间与MIS-TLIF相近,但小通道单孔道内镜下融合术的手术时间比MIS-TLIF长。

结论

经皮内镜下腰椎椎间融合术具有创伤小、效果好的优点,但学习曲线长,该手术应严格选择适应证。未来,随着各种内镜融合技术的不断发展和完善,该技术将获得更好的应用前景。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of technical advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and its trend prospect].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 15;36(6):653-659. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202202075.
3
[Current status and progress of minimally invasive percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 15;36(6):660-664. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202203002.

本文引用的文献

5
Methods and Early Clinical Results of Percutaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Neurospine. 2020 Dec;17(4):910-920. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040302.151. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
6
Clinical Results and Complications of Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis.
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:396-404. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.033. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
Awake Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note.
HSS J. 2020 Jul;16(2):200-204. doi: 10.1007/s11420-020-09748-6. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
9
Real-time ultrasonography-magnetic resonance image fusion navigation for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Mar 27;33(2):192-198. doi: 10.3171/2020.1.SPINE191223. Print 2020 Aug 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验