Human Development & Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Human Development & Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Oct;222:105473. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105473. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
A limited body of work has examined the nature and scope of young children's science-related activities outside of the school context, and thus there is little understanding or consensus regarding what comprises the home science environment (HSE; e.g., interactions, activities, resources) and how specific factors of the HSE relate to children's science performance. The two primary goals of this study were to (a) examine the factor structure of a parent-report measure of home science interactions and (b) evaluate how these factors relate to the science core knowledge of young children from families with low incomes. A total of 125 families with children aged 3 to 5 years (52 girls) participated in the study. Children were assessed on a measure of science core knowledge, and parents completed a brief questionnaire on their home science interactions that included questions pertaining to both home science disciplinary core idea (DCI) engagement and home science and engineering practice (SEP) engagement. Findings revealed that although separating home science interactions into distinct DCI and SEP factors represented the data well, the best overall representation of home science interactions was a one-factor model that included only home DCI engagement items. In addition, home DCI engagement was significantly predictive of children's science core knowledge over and above a large group of covariates, including children's age, race/ethnicity, sex, and performance on math, executive function, and vocabulary tasks as well as their parents' education.
目前已有少量研究考察了儿童在校外开展的与科学相关的活动的性质和范围,因此,对于何为家庭科学环境(HSE;例如,互动、活动、资源)以及 HSE 的哪些特定因素与儿童的科学表现相关,我们知之甚少,也尚未达成共识。本研究有两个主要目标:(a)检验家长报告的家庭科学互动测量工具的结构因素;(b)评估这些因素如何与来自低收入家庭的幼儿的科学核心知识相关。共有 125 个有 3 至 5 岁儿童(52 名女孩)的家庭参与了这项研究。儿童接受了科学核心知识的评估,家长则完成了一份简短的家庭科学互动问卷,其中包括与家庭科学学科核心观念(DCI)参与和家庭科学与工程实践(SEP)参与相关的问题。研究结果表明,虽然将家庭科学互动分为不同的 DCI 和 SEP 因素可以很好地描述数据,但家庭科学互动的最佳总体表示是一个仅包含家庭 DCI 参与项目的单因素模型。此外,家庭 DCI 参与度可以显著预测儿童的科学核心知识,而其他大量协变量(包括儿童的年龄、种族/族裔、性别以及在数学、执行功能和词汇任务上的表现,以及其父母的教育程度)的影响则较小。