Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2023 Jun;53(6):1002-1009. doi: 10.1111/imj.15857. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
Obtaining accurate medication histories at transitions of care is challenging, but important for patient safety. Prescription exchange services (PES) securely transfer electronic prescription and dispensing records between prescribers and pharmacies, which is potentially useful data for determining medication histories.
To evaluate the accuracy of PES-derived medication histories.
Prospective observational study, at two Australian tertiary-referral health services. A convenience sample of adult inpatients was recruited. The main outcome measure was: proportion of patients with ≥1 errors in their PES-derived pre-admission medication histories, compared with gold-standard best-possible medication histories, including prescribed and non-prescribed medications, obtained by pharmacists using multiple sources including patient/carer interview.
Of 154 patients (median age 76 years; interquartile range (IQR) 64-84 years; median 10.0 pre-admission medications; IQR 6.0-14.0), 153 (99.4%) had ≥1 errors in their PES-derived medication history (median 6.0 errors per patient; IQR 4.0-9.0). Excluding when-required medications, 146 (94.8%) patients had >1 errors (median 4.0 errors per patient; IQR 2.0-6.0). Omission was the most common error, affecting 549 (33.3%) of 1648 current medications (median 3.0; IQR 1.0-5.0 per patient); 396 (72.1%) omissions were over-the-counter medicines. Dose-regimen errors affected 276 (25.1%) of 1099 current medications captured in PES-derived medication histories (median 1.0 error per patient; IQR 0.0-3.0). Commission errors (medications in PES-derived histories that were not current) affected 224 (16.9%) of 1323 medications (median 1.0 error per patient; IQR 1.0-2.0).
Medication histories derived solely from a cloud-based medication record repository had a high error rate compared with patients' actual medication use. Like all medication history sources, data from cloud-based repositories need to be verified with additional sources including the patient and/or their carer.
在医疗保健转移过程中获取准确的用药史具有挑战性,但对患者安全很重要。处方交换服务(PES)可以在开方者和药剂师之间安全地传输电子处方和配药记录,这对于确定用药史可能是有用的数据。
评估 PES 衍生用药史的准确性。
这是一项在澳大利亚两家三级转诊医疗机构进行的前瞻性观察性研究。便利招募了成年住院患者。主要观察指标为:与药剂师使用包括患者/照顾者访谈在内的多种来源获得的最佳可能用药史(包括处方和非处方药物)相比,PES 衍生的入院前用药史中≥1 处错误的患者比例。
在 154 名患者(中位年龄 76 岁;四分位距(IQR)64-84 岁;中位 10.0 种入院前药物;IQR 6.0-14.0)中,153 名(99.4%)患者的 PES 衍生用药史中有≥1 处错误(中位每位患者 6.0 处错误;IQR 4.0-9.0)。不包括按需药物,146 名(94.8%)患者有>1 处错误(中位每位患者 4.0 处错误;IQR 2.0-6.0)。遗漏是最常见的错误,影响 1648 种当前药物中的 549 种(33.3%)(中位每位患者 3.0 种;IQR 1.0-5.0);396 种(72.1%)遗漏是非处方药物。剂量方案错误影响了 1099 种 PES 衍生用药史中记录的当前药物中的 276 种(25.1%)(中位每位患者 1.0 处错误;IQR 0.0-3.0)。用药错误(PES 衍生史中的药物不是当前药物)影响了 1323 种药物中的 224 种(16.9%)(中位每位患者 1.0 处错误;IQR 1.0-2.0)。
与患者实际用药相比,仅从基于云的用药记录存储库中获得的用药史错误率很高。与所有用药史来源一样,来自基于云的存储库的数据需要与患者和/或其照顾者等其他来源进行核实。