Qin Hai-Rong, Guo Wen-Feng, Wang Wei, Yang Sha, Li Xiao-Qiong
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forestry Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Guangxi Crop Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology Laboratory, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Jun;33(6):1661-1668. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202206.018.
Many alien invasive plants were clonal species. Examining the relationship between clonal integration characteristics and invasiveness of alien clonal plants is important for clarifying their ecological adaptability and invasion mechanisms. Here, with the invasive plant species and its native congener as the studying objects, we compared the effects of clonal integration on the growth and the biomass allocation of the apical ramets, basal ramets, and the whole fragment of both species under herbivory by the biocontrol beetle The results showed that under herbivory by , leaf number, stolon length, and ramet number of the apical ramets as well as the ground diameter of the whole fragment of were significantly higher under clonal integration treatment compared to that without clonal integration, whereas belowground biomass and total biomass of the basal ramets and the whole fragment of were conversely decreased by 78.2%, 60.9 % and 48.7%, 37.2%, respectively, under clonal integration treatment compared to that without clonal integration. Ground diameter of the apical ramets and leaf number of the whole fragment of were significantly higher, but the number of basal ramets was 21.7% lower under clonal integration treatment compared to that without clonal integration. The biomass of the apical ramets, basal ramets, and whole fragment of . did not significantly differ between clonal integration and without clonal integration treatments. The results of cost-benefit analysis showed that the ramet number and biomass of the apical ramets of as well as the ramet number of the apical ramets of were significantly benefited from clonal integration, but the cost-benefit of the ramet number and biomass of the basal ramets of both species were not affected by clonal integration treatment. These results suggested that clonal integration could partly alleviate herbivory pressure by on the apical ramets of both species, and that the clonal integration ability of was stronger than . However, both species seemed not able to gain significant benefits from cloning integration at the whole fragment level.
许多外来入侵植物都是克隆植物。研究克隆整合特征与外来克隆植物入侵性之间的关系,对于阐明其生态适应性和入侵机制具有重要意义。在此,以入侵植物物种及其本地同属植物为研究对象,我们比较了在生物防治甲虫取食情况下,克隆整合对两种植物顶部分株、基部分株及整个片段的生长和生物量分配的影响。结果表明,在 取食情况下,与无克隆整合相比,克隆整合处理下 的顶部分株的叶片数、匍匐茎长度和分株数以及整个片段的地径显著更高,而克隆整合处理下 的基部分株和整个片段的地下生物量和总生物量与无克隆整合相比分别相反地减少了78.2%、60.9%以及48.7%、37.2%。克隆整合处理下 的顶部分株地径和整个片段的叶片数显著更高,但基部分株数比无克隆整合处理低21.7%。 的顶部分株、基部分株和整个片段的生物量在克隆整合和无克隆整合处理之间没有显著差异。成本效益分析结果表明, 的顶部分株的分株数和生物量以及 的顶部分株的分株数从克隆整合中显著受益,但两种植物基部分株的分株数和生物量的成本效益不受克隆整合处理的影响。这些结果表明,克隆整合可以部分缓解 对两种植物顶部分株的取食压力,并且 的克隆整合能力强于 。然而,两种植物在整个片段水平上似乎都无法从克隆整合中获得显著益处。