Otto Włodzimierz, Sierdziński Janusz, Smaga Justyna, Kornasiewicz Oskar, Dudek Krzysztof, Zieniewicz Krzysztof
Department of General, Transplant & Liver Surgery, University Medical Center, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Medical Informatics and Telemedicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Litewska 14/16, 00-581 Warsaw, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 13;11(12):3396. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123396.
Background: Bile duct injury complicates patients’ lives, despite the subsequent repair. Repairing the injury must restore continuity of the bile tree and bring the patient into a state of cure referred to as “patency”. Actuarial primary or actuarial secondary patency rates, depending on whether the patient underwent primary or secondary repair of injury, are proposed to be a proper metric in evaluating outcomes. This study was undertaken to assess outcomes of 669 patients with bile duct injuries Strasberg D and E type referred to the department from public surgical wards between 1990 and 2020. In 442 patients, no attempt was made to repair prior to a referral, and in 227 an attempt to repair was made which failed. Methods: Observations were summarized on December 31st, 2020. The retrospective analysis included: primary patency attained (Grade A result), secondary patency attained (Grade C result), patency loss, and actuarial patency rates of the bile tree at 2, 5, and 10 years. Results: Twenty-five (3.7%) patients died after repair surgery. Actuarial patency rates at 2, 5, and 10 years of follow-up were 93%, 88%, and 74% or 86%, 75%, and 55% in patients attaining Grade A and Grade C outcomes, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Bile duct injury stands out as a surgical challenge, requiring specialized management at a referral center. Improper proceeding after an injury is the factor leading to faster loss of anastomotic patency.
尽管胆管损伤后续可进行修复,但仍会给患者生活带来诸多困扰。修复损伤必须恢复胆管树的连续性,并使患者达到“通畅”这一治愈状态。根据患者接受的是初次损伤修复还是二次损伤修复,预计初次通畅率或二次通畅率是评估治疗效果的合适指标。本研究旨在评估1990年至2020年间从公共外科病房转至该科室的669例Strasberg D型和E型胆管损伤患者的治疗效果。442例患者在转诊前未尝试修复,227例患者尝试修复但失败。方法:观察总结于2020年12月31日。回顾性分析包括:达到的初次通畅率(A级结果)、达到的二次通畅率(C级结果)、通畅性丧失以及胆管树在2年、5年和10年时的预计通畅率。结果:25例(3.7%)患者在修复手术后死亡。达到A级和C级治疗效果的患者在随访2年、5年和10年时的预计通畅率分别为93%、88%和74%或86%、75%和55%(p<0.001)。结论:胆管损伤是一项外科挑战,需要在转诊中心进行专业管理。损伤后处理不当是导致吻合口通畅性更快丧失的因素。