Wei Yan-Hui, Miao Zhao-Xu, Guo Xue-Jun
Department of Haematology, Puyang Oilfield General Hospital Affiliated with Xinxiang Medical University, Puyang, China.
School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Int J Lab Hematol. 2022 Oct;44(5):945-951. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13917. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
This study analysed the relationships between the main thromboelastography (TEG) parameters, the platelet (PLT) count and clinical bleeding in patients with blood diseases. We explored the threshold of the relevant parameters in the pathological condition of bleeding, aiming to scientifically guide clinical prophylactic PLT transfusion.
In total, 268 patients with clear diagnoses of blood diseases and thrombocytopenia were enrolled and divided into five groups, A, B, C, D and E, corresponding to PLT counts of 0-10 × 10 /L, 11-20 × 10 /L, 21-30 × 10 /L, 31-50 × 10 /L and 51-100 × 10 /L, respectively. TEG and routine blood testing were performed simultaneously, the main TEG parameters and the PLT count were analysed, and the thresholds of the main TEG parameters in each group when the patient had bleeding were obtained.
The maximum amplitude (MA) in groups A, B and C increased gradually, with a significant difference between each pair of these groups (P < 0.05). In groups A, B, C, D and E, the corresponding MA at the time of bleeding was 43.5 mm, 39.6 mm, 38.0 mm, 35.2 mm and 50.5 mm, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).
The MA can be used as a reference indicator for preventive PLT transfusion to a certain extent. When the PLT count is within different ranges, the MA threshold for preventive PLT transfusion also differs. It is recommended that different PLT counts be correlated with different MA thresholds to guide clinical prophylactic PLT transfusion.
本研究分析血液系统疾病患者主要血栓弹力图(TEG)参数、血小板(PLT)计数与临床出血之间的关系。探讨出血病理状态下相关参数的阈值,旨在科学指导临床预防性血小板输注。
共纳入268例明确诊断为血液系统疾病且血小板减少的患者,分为A、B、C、D、E五组,分别对应PLT计数为0 - 10×10⁹/L、11 - 20×10⁹/L、21 - 30×10⁹/L、31 - 50×10⁹/L和51 - 100×10⁹/L。同时进行TEG和血常规检测,分析主要TEG参数和PLT计数,得出各组患者出血时主要TEG参数的阈值。
A、B、C组的最大振幅(MA)逐渐升高,两两之间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。A、B、C、D、E组出血时对应的MA分别为43.5mm、39.6mm、38.0mm、35.2mm和50.5mm,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
MA在一定程度上可作为预防性血小板输注的参考指标。当PLT计数处于不同范围时,预防性血小板输注的MA阈值也不同。建议将不同的PLT计数与不同的MA阈值相关联,以指导临床预防性血小板输注。