Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France; Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Instituto do Cérebro, Universidade Federal do Rio grande do Norte, R. do Horto, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN 59076-550, Brazil; UMR 7023, Structures Formelles du Langage, Université Paris 8, 2 rue de la Liberté, 93200 Saint-Denis, France.
Cogn Psychol. 2022 Aug;136:101494. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101494. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
Geometry defines entities that can be physically realized in space, and our knowledge of abstract geometry may therefore stem from our representations of the physical world. Here, we focus on Euclidean geometry, the geometry historically regarded as "natural". We examine whether humans possess representations describing visual forms in the same way as Euclidean geometry - i.e., in terms of their shape and size. One hundred and twelve participants from the U.S. (age 3-34 years), and 25 participants from the Amazon (age 5-67 years) were asked to locate geometric deviants in panels of 6 forms of variable orientation. Participants of all ages and from both cultures detected deviant forms defined in terms of shape or size, while only U.S. adults drew distinctions between mirror images (i.e. forms differing in "sense"). Moreover, irrelevant variations of sense did not disrupt the detection of a shape or size deviant, while irrelevant variations of shape or size did. At all ages and in both cultures, participants thus retained the same properties as Euclidean geometry in their analysis of visual forms, even in the absence of formal instruction in geometry. These findings show that representations of planar visual forms provide core intuitions on which humans' knowledge in Euclidean geometry could possibly be grounded.
几何定义了可以在空间中实际实现的实体,因此我们对抽象几何的了解可能源于我们对物理世界的表述。在这里,我们专注于欧几里得几何,这是历史上被视为“自然”的几何。我们研究人类是否拥有与欧几里得几何相同的描述视觉形式的表示法,即根据其形状和大小来描述。我们要求来自美国的 112 名参与者(年龄 3-34 岁)和来自亚马逊的 25 名参与者(年龄 5-67 岁)在 6 个不同方向的面板中定位几何偏差。所有年龄和两种文化的参与者都能检测到根据形状或大小定义的偏差形式,而只有美国成年人能区分镜像(即“意义”不同的形式)。此外,无关意义的变化不会干扰对形状或大小偏差的检测,而无关形状或大小的变化则会。因此,所有年龄和两种文化的参与者在分析视觉形式时都保留了与欧几里得几何相同的属性,即使没有接受过正式的几何教学。这些发现表明,平面视觉形式的表示提供了人类在欧几里得几何知识中可能基于的核心直觉。