Center for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, School of Engineering, 177 College Ave, Medford, MA 02155, United States.
Cogn Psychol. 2022 Aug;136:101495. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101495. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
Theory of mind (ToM) is an essential ability for social competence and communication, and it is necessary for understanding behaviors that differ from our own (Premack & Woodruff, 1978). Recent research suggests that tasks designed to measure ToM do not adequately capture a single ToM ability (Warnell & Redcay, 2019; Quesque & Rossetti, 2020) and, instead, might be related to tasks of general cognitive ability (Coyle, Elpers, Gonzalez, Freeman, & Baggio, 2018). This hinders the interpretation of experimental findings and puts into question the validity of the ToM construct. The current study is the first psychometric assessment of the structure of ToM to date. Comparing ToM to crystallized intelligence (Gc) and fluid intelligence (Gf), the study aims to (a) understand whether ToM should be considered a monolithic ability and (b) explore whether tasks of ToM adequately assess ToM, above and beyond general cognitive ability. For this, confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and exploratory network analysis (NMA) were conducted. The results of the models largely point to the same conclusion: while ToM tasks are not merely assessing cognitive ability, they are not purely assessing a single ToM construct either. Importantly, these findings align with recent theoretical accounts proposing that ToM should not be considered a monolithic construct (Quesque & Rossetti, 2020; Schaafsma, Pfaff, Spunt, & Adolphs, 2015, Devaine, Hollard, & Daunizeau, 2014), and should instead be explored and measured as multiple domains.
心理理论(Theory of mind,ToM)是社交能力和沟通的基本能力,也是理解不同于我们自身行为的必要能力(Premack & Woodruff,1978)。最近的研究表明,用于衡量心理理论的任务并不能充分捕捉单一的心理理论能力(Warnell & Redcay,2019;Quesque & Rossetti,2020),而是可能与一般认知能力的任务有关(Coyle,Elpers,Gonzalez,Freeman,& Baggio,2018)。这阻碍了对实验结果的解释,并对心理理论结构的有效性提出了质疑。本研究是迄今为止对心理理论结构的首次心理计量学评估。通过将心理理论与晶体智力(Crystallized intelligence,Gc)和流体智力(Fluid intelligence,Gf)进行比较,该研究旨在(a)了解心理理论是否应被视为单一能力,以及(b)探索心理理论任务是否充分评估了心理理论,超越了一般认知能力。为此,进行了验证性因素分析(Confirmatory factor analysis,CFA)、探索性因素分析(Exploratory factor analysis,EFA)和探索性网络分析(Network analysis,NMA)。模型的结果在很大程度上得出了相同的结论:尽管心理理论任务不仅仅是评估认知能力,但它们也不是纯粹评估单一的心理理论结构。重要的是,这些发现与最近的理论观点一致,即心理理论不应被视为单一的结构(Quesque & Rossetti,2020;Schaafsma,Pfaff,Spunt,& Adolphs,2015;Devaine,Hollard,& Daunizeau,2014),而应该作为多个领域进行探索和衡量。