Suppr超能文献

使用三种不同技术拆除陶瓷托槽后牙釉质表面的光学相干断层扫描评估

Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques.

作者信息

Khader Maimoona Abdul, Dileep Soorya, Gafoor A Abdul, Mj Jijin, Sunil Manisha, Krishnaraj Parthiban

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Educare Institute of Dental Sciences, Chattiparambu, Malappuram, Kerala, India.

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Orthod Sci. 2022 May 4;11:16. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_192_21. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the enamel surface damage and residual adhesive remnant [adhesive remnant index (ARI)] on extracted premolars after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different debonding techniques, with optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

Ninety extracted premolars were bonded with ceramic brackets and divided into three groups of 30 teeth each based on debonding techniques used. Twenty-four hours later, they were debonded using three different debonding techniques: debonding pliers, ultrasonic scalers, and Er-YAG laser. A baseline scan was obtained prior to bonding using OCT. The teeth were evaluated for the adhesive remnant on the tooth surface using ARI score, and the amount of enamel surface damage was evaluated using OCT.

RESULTS

We observed that the use of ultrasonic scalers as a debonding technique led to greater incidence of enamel surface damage as measured in OCT. The ARI scores with debonding pliers and laser were significantly greater than that of scaler debonding.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study confirmed that use of ultrasonic scalers as a debonding technique led to significantly greater incidence of enamel surface damage when compared to the other two debonding techniques. The ARI scores on the tooth surface using debonding pliers and laser were significantly greater than that of the scaler debonding technique.

摘要

目的

使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估采用三种不同脱粘技术去除陶瓷托槽后,拔除的前磨牙的牙釉质表面损伤和残留粘结剂(粘结剂残留指数[ARI])情况。

方法

90颗拔除的前磨牙粘结陶瓷托槽,并根据所使用的脱粘技术分为三组,每组30颗牙。24小时后,采用三种不同的脱粘技术将托槽去除:脱粘钳、超声洁牙器和铒钇铝石榴石激光。在粘结前使用OCT进行基线扫描。使用ARI评分评估牙齿表面的粘结剂残留情况,并使用OCT评估牙釉质表面损伤程度。

结果

我们观察到,采用超声洁牙器作为脱粘技术时,OCT测量显示牙釉质表面损伤的发生率更高。使用脱粘钳和激光时的ARI评分显著高于使用超声洁牙器脱粘时的评分。

结论

本研究结果证实,与其他两种脱粘技术相比,采用超声洁牙器作为脱粘技术会导致牙釉质表面损伤的发生率显著更高。使用脱粘钳和激光时牙齿表面的ARI评分显著高于超声洁牙器脱粘技术的评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f638/9214424/824ceb9b4604/JOS-11-16-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验