School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland; Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 19 Chlorine Gardens, Belfast, Northern Ireland BT9 5DL, UK.
Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 19 Chlorine Gardens, Belfast, Northern Ireland BT9 5DL, UK; Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), 12587 Berlin, Germany; Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Biology, Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3, 14195 Berlin, Germany; GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 15;843:156876. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156876. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
Interactions between multiple invasive alien species (IAS) might increase their ecological impacts, yet relatively few studies have attempted to quantify the effects of facilitative interactions on the success and impact of aquatic IAS. Further, the effect of abiotic factors, such as habitat structure, have lacked consideration in ecological impact prediction for many high-profile IAS, with most data acquired through simplified assessments that do not account for real environmental complexities. In the present study, we assessed a potential facilitative interaction between a predatory invasive fish, the Ponto-Caspian round goby (Neogobius melanostomus), and an invasive bivalve, the Asian clam (Corbicula fluminea). We compared N. melanostomus functional responses (feeding-rates under different prey densities) to a co-occurring endangered European native analogue fish, the bullhead (Cottus gobio), in the presence of increased levels of habitat complexity driven by the accumulation of dead C. fluminea biomass that persists within the environment (i.e. 0, 10, 20 empty bivalve shells). Habitat complexity significantly influenced predation, with consumption in the absence of shells being greater than where 10 or 20 shells were present. However, at the highest shell density, invasive N. melanostomus maximum feeding-rates and functional response ratios were substantially higher than those of native C. gobio. Further, the Relative Impact Potential metric, by combining per capita effects and population abundances, indicated that higher shell densities exacerbate the relative impact of the invader. It therefore appears that N. melanostomus can better tolerate higher IAS shell abundances when foraging at high prey densities, suggesting the occurrence of an important facilitative interaction. Our data are thus fully congruent with field data that link establishment success of N. melanostomus with the presence of C. fluminea. Overall, we show that invader-driven benthic habitat complexity can alter the feeding-rates and thus impacts of predatory fishes, and highlight the importance of inclusion of abiotic factors in impact prediction assessments for IAS.
多种入侵外来物种(IAS)之间的相互作用可能会增加它们的生态影响,但相对较少的研究试图量化促进相互作用对水生 IAS 成功和影响的影响。此外,生境结构等非生物因素的影响在许多备受瞩目的 IAS 的生态影响预测中缺乏考虑,大多数数据是通过简化评估获得的,这些评估没有考虑到实际的环境复杂性。在本研究中,我们评估了一种捕食性入侵鱼类,里海鳞鰕虎鱼(Neogobius melanostomus)和一种入侵双壳类动物,亚洲河蚌(Corbicula fluminea)之间可能存在的促进相互作用。我们比较了里海鳞鰕虎鱼的功能反应(在不同猎物密度下的摄食率)与共存的濒危欧洲本地类似鱼类,圆鳍鱼(Cottus gobio),在环境中积累的死亚洲河蚌生物量驱动下的生境复杂性增加的情况下(即 0、10、20 个空双壳贝壳)。生境复杂性对捕食有显著影响,在没有贝壳的情况下,消耗的食物量大于有 10 个或 20 个贝壳的情况。然而,在最高壳密度下,入侵的里海鳞鰕虎鱼的最大摄食率和功能反应比具有本地的圆鳍鱼高很多。此外,通过结合个体效应和种群丰度的相对影响潜力指标表明,较高的壳密度会加剧入侵物种的相对影响。因此,当在高猎物密度下觅食时,里海鳞鰕虎鱼似乎可以更好地耐受更高的 IAS 壳丰度,这表明存在重要的促进相互作用。我们的数据与将里海鳞鰕虎鱼的建立成功与亚洲河蚌的存在联系起来的实地数据完全一致。总的来说,我们表明,入侵驱动的底栖生境复杂性可以改变捕食性鱼类的摄食率,从而影响它们的影响,并强调在 IAS 影响预测评估中纳入非生物因素的重要性。