Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai National Clinical Research Center for metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory for Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases of the National Health Commission of the PR China, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Endocrine Tumor, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Diabetes. 2022 Jun;14(6):414-424. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13289.
Family history of diabetes, unhealthy lifestyles, and metabolic disorders are individually associated with higher risk of diabetes, but how different combinations of the three risk categories are associated with incident diabetes remains unclear. We aimed to estimate the associations of comprehensive risk profiles of family history and lifestyle and metabolic risk factors with diabetes risk.
This study included 5290 participants without diabetes at baseline with a mean follow-up of 4.4 years. Five unhealthy lifestyles and five metabolic disorders were each allocated a score, resulting in an aggregated lifestyle and metabolic risk score ranging from 0 to 5. Eight risk profiles were constructed from combinations of three risk categories: family history of diabetes (yes, no), lifestyle risk (high, low), and metabolic risk (high, low).
Compared with the profile without any risk category, other profiles exhibited incrementally higher risks of diabetes with increasing numbers of categories: the hazard ratio (HR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) for diabetes ranged from 1.34 (1.01-1.79) to 2.33 (1.60-3.39) for profiles with one risk category, ranged from 2.42 (1.45-4.04) to 4.18 (2.42-7.21) for profiles with two risk categories, and was 4.59 (2.85-7.39) for the profile with three risk categories. The associations between the numbers of risk categories and diabetes risk were more prominent in women (p = .025) and slightly more prominent in adults <55 years (p = .052).
This study delineated associations between comprehensive risk profiles with diabetes risk, with stronger associations observed in women and slightly stronger associations in adults younger than 55 years.
糖尿病家族史、不健康的生活方式和代谢紊乱各自与糖尿病风险增加相关,但不同风险类别的组合与糖尿病发病风险的关系尚不清楚。我们旨在评估家族史和生活方式以及代谢危险因素的综合风险概况与糖尿病风险之间的关联。
本研究纳入了 5290 名基线时无糖尿病的参与者,平均随访时间为 4.4 年。将五种不健康的生活方式和五种代谢紊乱分别赋予一个分数,从而得出一个从 0 到 5 的综合生活方式和代谢风险评分。从三个风险类别(糖尿病家族史(有,无)、生活方式风险(高,低)和代谢风险(高,低)的组合构建了八种风险概况。
与没有任何风险类别的概况相比,其他概况中随着风险类别的增加,糖尿病的风险呈递增趋势:具有一个风险类别的概况的糖尿病风险比(HR,95%置信区间[CI])范围为 1.34(1.01-1.79)至 2.33(1.60-3.39),具有两个风险类别的概况的 HR 范围为 2.42(1.45-4.04)至 4.18(2.42-7.21),具有三个风险类别的概况的 HR 为 4.59(2.85-7.39)。在女性(p = 0.025)和年龄<55 岁的成年人(p = 0.052)中,风险类别数量与糖尿病风险之间的关联更为显著。
本研究描述了综合风险概况与糖尿病风险之间的关联,在女性和年龄<55 岁的成年人中观察到的关联更强。