• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国女性筛查宫颈癌和结直肠癌的比例均低于单一癌症:一项基于人群的横断面观察性研究。

US women screen at low rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer: a cross-sectional population-based observational study.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2022 Jun 28;11:e76070. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76070.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.76070
PMID:35762572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9239676/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using screen counts, women 50-64 years old have lower cancer screening rates for cervical and colorectal cancers (CRC) than all other age ranges. This paper aims to present woman-centric cervical cancer and CRC screenings to determine the predictor of being up-to-date for both.

METHODS

We used the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), an annual survey to guide health policy in the United States, to explore the up-to-date status of dual cervical cancer and CRC screening for women 50-64 years old. We categorized women into four mutually exclusive categories: up-to-date for dual-screening, each single screen, or neither screen. We used multinomial multivariate regression modeling to evaluate the predictors of each category.

RESULTS

Among women ages 50-64 years old, dual-screening was reported for 58.2% (57.1-59.4), cervical cancer screening alone (27.1% (26.0-28.2)), CRC screening alone (5.4% (4.9-5.9)), and neither screen (9.3% (8.7-9.9)). Age, race, education, income, and chronic health conditions were significantly associated with dual-screening compared to neither screen. Hispanic women compared to non-Hispanic White women were more likely to be up-to-date with cervical cancer screening than dual-screening (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = ). Compared to younger women, those 60-64 years are significantly more likely to be up-to-date with CRC screening than dual-screening (aOR = ).

CONCLUSIONS

Screening received by each woman shows a much lower rate of dual-screening than prior single cancer screening rates. Addressing dual-screening strategies rather than single cancer screening programs for women 50-64 years may increase both cancer screening rates.

FUNDING

This work was supported by NIH through the Michigan Institute for Clinical and61 Health Research UL1TR002240 and by NCI through The University of Michigan Rogel Cancer62 Center P30CA046592 grants.

摘要

背景

50-64 岁的女性进行宫颈癌和结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的比例低于所有其他年龄段。本文旨在针对女性进行宫颈癌和 CRC 筛查,以确定两者均接受筛查的预测因素。

方法

我们使用行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS),这是一项指导美国健康政策的年度调查,来探索 50-64 岁女性接受双重宫颈癌和 CRC 筛查的最新情况。我们将女性分为四个互斥类别:双重筛查、单独的宫颈癌筛查、单独的 CRC 筛查或两者均未筛查。我们使用多项多元回归模型来评估每个类别的预测因素。

结果

在 50-64 岁的女性中,报告双重筛查的比例为 58.2%(57.1-59.4),单独进行宫颈癌筛查的比例为 27.1%(26.0-28.2),单独进行 CRC 筛查的比例为 5.4%(4.9-5.9),两者均未筛查的比例为 9.3%(8.7-9.9)。与两者均未筛查相比,年龄、种族、教育程度、收入和慢性健康状况与双重筛查显著相关。与非西班牙裔白人女性相比,西班牙裔女性更有可能接受宫颈癌筛查,而不是双重筛查(调整后的优势比[aOR]为 )。与年轻女性相比,60-64 岁的女性更有可能接受 CRC 筛查,而不是双重筛查(aOR= )。

结论

每位女性接受的筛查显示,双重筛查的比例远低于之前的单一癌症筛查率。为 50-64 岁的女性制定双重筛查策略而不是单一癌症筛查计划,可能会提高两种癌症的筛查率。

资助

这项工作得到了 NIH 通过密歇根临床和健康研究转化研究所 UL1TR002240 以及 NCI 通过密歇根大学罗格尔癌症中心 P30CA046592 拨款的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5787/9239676/505e8bcbd9fe/elife-76070-app1-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5787/9239676/1414901e6cb5/elife-76070-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5787/9239676/505e8bcbd9fe/elife-76070-app1-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5787/9239676/1414901e6cb5/elife-76070-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5787/9239676/505e8bcbd9fe/elife-76070-app1-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
US women screen at low rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer: a cross-sectional population-based observational study.美国女性筛查宫颈癌和结直肠癌的比例均低于单一癌症:一项基于人群的横断面观察性研究。
Elife. 2022 Jun 28;11:e76070. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76070.
2
Cancer risk perception and physician communication behaviors on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer screening.癌症风险认知与医生在宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查中的沟通行为。
Elife. 2021 Aug 24;10:e70003. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70003.
3
Predictors of screening for cervical and colorectal cancer in women 50-65 years old in a multi-ethnic population.多民族人群中50至65岁女性宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的预测因素
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Apr 19;22:101375. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101375. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Understanding the role of access in Hispanic cancer screening disparities.理解可及性在西班牙裔癌症筛查差异中的作用。
Cancer. 2023 May 15;129(10):1569-1578. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34696. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium.评估 PROSPR 联盟中乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌的筛查参与、随访和结局。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Mar 1;112(3):238-246. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz137.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
8
Geographic Variation in Overscreening for Colorectal, Cervical, and Breast Cancer Among Older Adults.老年人中结直肠、宫颈和乳腺癌过度筛查的地域差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011645. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11645.
9
Changes in Health Care Access and Preventive Health Screenings by Race and Ethnicity.种族和民族的医疗保健机会和预防性健康筛查的变化。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235058. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5058.
10
Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence: Effect of Low Body Mass Index in Women.乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的依从性:女性低体重指数的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jul;29(7):996-1006. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7739. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of an EHR Order Set on Cancer Screening Order Rates in Community-Based Health Centers.电子健康记录医嘱集对社区卫生中心癌症筛查医嘱率的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 May;16(3):496-506. doi: 10.1055/a-2524-5076. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Promoting Artificial Intelligence for Global Breast Cancer Risk Prediction and Screening in Adult Women: A Scoping Review.促进人工智能用于成年女性全球乳腺癌风险预测与筛查:一项范围综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 25;13(9):2525. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092525.
3
Enrollee characteristics and receipt of colorectal cancer testing in Pennsylvania after adoption of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Centered Home Cancer Screening Attitudes During COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间以患者为中心的家庭癌症筛查态度
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2021 Oct 18;8(4):340-346. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1835. eCollection 2021 Fall.
2
Cancer risk perception and physician communication behaviors on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer screening.癌症风险认知与医生在宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查中的沟通行为。
Elife. 2021 Aug 24;10:e70003. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70003.
3
Uptake of co-testing with HPV and cytology for cervical screening: A population-based evaluation in the United States.
平价医疗法案扩大医疗补助后宾夕法尼亚州参保者特征与结直肠癌检测接受情况
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15455-15467. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6168. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
4
Cancer InFocus: Tools for Cancer Center Catchment Area Geographic Data Collection and Visualization.癌症聚焦:癌症中心集水区地理数据收集与可视化工具
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 May 24;32(7):OF1-OF5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1319.
联合应用 HPV 和细胞学检测进行宫颈癌筛查的接受度:美国的一项基于人群的评估。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Sep;162(3):555-559. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.029. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
4
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
5
Predictors of screening for cervical and colorectal cancer in women 50-65 years old in a multi-ethnic population.多民族人群中50至65岁女性宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的预测因素
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Apr 19;22:101375. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101375. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Cervical screening attendance and cervical cancer risk among women who have sex with women.女同性恋者的宫颈筛查参与率和宫颈癌风险。
J Med Screen. 2021 Sep;28(3):349-356. doi: 10.1177/0969141320987271. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Pandemic Spotlights In-home Colon Cancer Screening Tests.大流行凸显家庭结肠癌筛查测试
JAMA. 2020 Dec 23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22466.
8
The future of cancer screening after COVID-19 may be at home.新冠肺炎疫情之后,癌症筛查可能会在家中进行。
Cancer. 2021 Feb 15;127(4):498-503. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33274. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
9
Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.普通风险人群的宫颈癌筛查:美国癌症协会 2020 年指南更新。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Sep;70(5):321-346. doi: 10.3322/caac.21628. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
10
Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.邮寄粪便免疫化学试验进行结直肠癌筛查:疾病预防控制中心主办的峰会总结。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):283-298. doi: 10.3322/caac.21615. Epub 2020 Jun 25.