Postgraduate student, Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jun;131(6):1276-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.024. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
Retention is essential for maxillofacial prosthesis. Adhesives are commonly used for retention because of their simplicity, availability, and cost-effectiveness. Studies that have estimated the differences in bond strength between the types of adhesives and the impact of reapplication are sparse.
The purpose of this observational clinical study was to estimate the peel bond strength and reapplication effects of water-based and silicone-based adhesives at 0, 24, and 48 hours.
A total of 46 participants were enrolled, with 23 participants in each adhesive test group-water-based and silicone-based adhesive. Silicone elastomeric strips were attached to the ventral aspect of the participants' forearm 5 cm away from the radial styloid prominence. The strength of each adhesive group was tested at 0 hours, and its reapplication effects were evaluated at 24 and 48 hours. The peel bond strength was estimated by using a universal testing machine, and the data were recorded in N/m and statistically analyzed by the independent Student t test and Spearman rho correlation coefficient tests (α=.05).
The mean ±standard deviation of peel bond strength at 0 hours for silicone-based adhesive (111.5 ±2.5 N/m) was higher than that for water-based adhesive (99.9 ±3.9 N/m) (P<.001). On reapplication, the silicone-based adhesive had a higher peel bond strength (113.5 ±2.8 N/m) than the water-based adhesive (105.2 ±3.0 N/m) (P<.001). The results were statistically significant between the 2 groups at different time intervals (P=.04).
The mean peel bond strength of the silicone-based adhesive was higher than that of the water-based adhesive. The reapplication of adhesives improved the bond strength in both the groups.
保持力对于颌面修复体至关重要。由于其简单性、可用性和成本效益,胶粘剂通常用于保持力。估计不同类型胶粘剂之间的粘结强度差异以及再应用影响的研究很少。
本观察性临床研究的目的是估计水基和硅基胶粘剂在 0、24 和 48 小时时的剥离粘结强度和再应用效果。
共招募了 46 名参与者,每组 23 名参与者,分别为水基和硅基胶粘剂测试组。硅酮弹性带附着在参与者前臂的腹侧,距离桡骨茎突 5 厘米。在 0 小时时测试每个胶粘剂组的强度,并在 24 和 48 小时时评估其再应用效果。使用万能试验机估计剥离粘结强度,以 N/m 为单位记录数据,并通过独立学生 t 检验和斯皮尔曼 rho 相关系数检验(α=.05)进行统计分析。
硅基胶粘剂在 0 小时时的平均±标准差为 111.5±2.5 N/m,高于水基胶粘剂的 99.9±3.9 N/m(P<.001)。在再应用时,硅基胶粘剂的剥离粘结强度(113.5±2.8 N/m)高于水基胶粘剂(105.2±3.0 N/m)(P<.001)。在不同时间间隔,两组之间的结果具有统计学意义(P=.04)。
硅基胶粘剂的平均剥离粘结强度高于水基胶粘剂。胶粘剂的再应用提高了两组的粘结强度。