Suppr超能文献

放大学生声音:医学生对美国医学荣誉学会(AΩA)的看法

Amplifying the Student Voice: Medical Student Perceptions of AΩA.

作者信息

Jones Jeremy M, Berman Alexandra B, Tan Erik X, Mohanty Sarthak, Rose Michelle A, Shea Judy A, Kogan Jennifer R

机构信息

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07544-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has suggested racial disparities in Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society (AΩA) selection and raised concerns about its effects on the learning environment. Internal reviews at multiple institutions have led to changes in selection practices or suspension of student chapters; in October 2020, the national AΩA organization provided guidance to address these concerns.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to better understand student opinions of AΩA.

DESIGN

An anonymous survey using both multiple response option and free response questions.

PARTICIPANTS

Medical students at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

MAIN MEASURES

Descriptive statistics and logistic regressions were used to examine predictors of student opinion towards AΩA. Free responses were analyzed by two independent coders to identify key themes.

KEY RESULTS

In total, 70% of the student body (n = 547) completed the survey. Sixty-three percent had a negative opinion of AΩA, and 57% felt AΩA should not exist at the student level. Thirteen percent believed AΩA membership appropriately reflects the student body; 8% thought selection processes were fair. On multivariate analysis, negative predictors of a student's preference to continue AΩA at the student level included belief that AΩA membership does not currently mirror class composition (OR: 0.45, [95% CI: 0.23-0.89]) and that AΩA selection processes were unfair (OR: 0.20 [0.08-0.47]). Self-perception as not competitive for AΩA selection was also a negative predictor (OR: 0.44 [0.22-0.88]). Major qualitative themes included equity, impact on the learning environment, transparency, and positive aspects of AΩA.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-institution survey demonstrated significant student concerns regarding AΩA selection fairness and effects on the learning environment. Many critiques extended beyond AΩA itself, instead focusing on the perceived magnification of existing disparities in the learning environment. As the national conversation about AΩA continues, engaging student voices in the discussion is critical.

摘要

背景

近期文献表明,在阿尔法欧米茄阿尔法荣誉医学协会(AΩA)的选拔中存在种族差异,并引发了对其对学习环境影响的担忧。多所机构的内部审查导致选拔做法发生变化或学生分会暂停;2020年10月,AΩA全国组织提供了指导意见以解决这些问题。

目的

本研究旨在更好地了解学生对AΩA的看法。

设计

一项使用多项选择和自由回答问题的匿名调查。

参与者

宾夕法尼亚大学佩雷尔曼医学院的医学生。

主要测量指标

使用描述性统计和逻辑回归来检验学生对AΩA看法的预测因素。两名独立编码员对自由回答进行分析以确定关键主题。

关键结果

共有70%的学生群体(n = 547)完成了调查。63%的学生对AΩA持负面看法,57%的学生认为AΩA在学生层面不应存在。13%的学生认为AΩA成员资格恰当地反映了学生群体;8%的学生认为选拔过程是公平的。在多变量分析中,学生倾向于在学生层面继续保留AΩA的负面预测因素包括认为AΩA成员资格目前不能反映班级构成(比值比:0.45,[95%置信区间:0.23 - 0.89])以及AΩA选拔过程不公平(比值比:0.20 [0.08 - 0.47])。自我感觉在AΩA选拔中缺乏竞争力也是一个负面预测因素(比值比:0.44 [0.22 - 0.88])。主要的定性主题包括公平、对学习环境的影响、透明度以及AΩA的积极方面。

结论

这项单机构调查表明,学生对AΩA选拔的公平性及其对学习环境的影响存在重大担忧。许多批评不仅针对AΩA本身,而是更多地集中在学习环境中现有差异的感知放大上。随着关于AΩA的全国性讨论的继续进行,让学生参与讨论至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验