Peterman Nicholas J, Yeo Eunhae, Kaptur Brad, Smith Emily J, Christensen Anton, Huang Edward, Rasheed Mehmoodur
Medicine, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, USA.
Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, USA.
Cureus. 2022 May 28;14(5):e25425. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25425. eCollection 2022 May.
Purpose This work aims to conduct a geospatial analysis of recent ultrasound access and usage within the United States, with a particular focus on disparities between rural and urban areas. Methods/Materials Multiple public datasets were merged on a county level, including US Department of Agriculture economic metrics and Centers for Medicare Services data using the most recent years available (2015-2019). From these databases, 39 total variables encompassing the socioeconomic, health, and ultrasound characteristics of each county were obtained. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes incorporated included ultrasound-guided procedures and diagnostic exams. Three thousand eleven counties were included. The combined dataset was then exported to GeoDa for network-based analysis and to produce map visualizations. To identify statistically significant (p < 0.05) hotspots and coldspots in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) prevalence, Moran's I was used. Choropleth maps were created for visualization. ANOVA was run across the four Moran's I groups for each of 39 variables of interest. Results A total of 30,135,085 ultrasound-related CPT codes were billed to Medicare over 2015-2019, with 26.55% of codes being ultrasound-guided procedures and 73.45% being diagnostic exams. 38.84% of rural counties had access to POC ultrasound compared to 88.56% of metropolitan counties and 74.19% of counties overall. Hotspots of POCUS were in Southern California and the Eastern US (average of 1,441 per 10,000 Medicare members per year). Coldspot areas were seen in the Great Plains and Midwest (average of 7.43 per 10k Medicare members per year). Hotspot clusters, when compared to coldspot clusters, were significantly (p < 0.001) more dense (703.6 to 14.9 people per square mile), more urbanized (3.5 to 7.1 Rural-Urban Continuum (RUC)), more college-educated (25.1% to 20.0%), more likely to have an Emergency Department (ED) visit (725.8 to 616.9 visits per 1,000 Medicare members), more likely to be obese (19.0% to 12.9%), less likely to be uninsured (10.1% to 13.0%), had more Black representation (8.5% to 3.4%), and less Hispanic representation (2.6% to 5.5%). Conclusions Ultrasound access and usage demonstrate significant geospatial trends across the United States. Hotspot and coldspot counties differ on several key sociodemographic and economic variables.
目的 本研究旨在对美国近期超声检查的可及性和使用情况进行地理空间分析,特别关注农村和城市地区之间的差异。方法/材料 在县一级合并了多个公共数据集,包括美国农业部的经济指标和医疗保险服务中心的数据,使用的是可获取的最近几年(2015 - 2019年)的数据。从这些数据库中,获得了涵盖每个县社会经济、健康和超声特征的39个变量。纳入的现行程序编码(CPT)包括超声引导程序和诊断检查。共纳入3110个县。然后将合并后的数据集导出到GeoDa进行基于网络的分析并生成地图可视化。为了确定即时超声(POCUS)患病率具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)的热点和冷点,使用了莫兰指数(Moran's I)。创建了分级统计图进行可视化。对39个感兴趣变量中的每一个,在四个莫兰指数组中进行方差分析(ANOVA)。结果 在2015 - 2019年期间,共有30135085个与超声相关的CPT编码提交给了医疗保险,其中26.55%的编码为超声引导程序,73.45%为诊断检查。38.84%的农村县可进行POCUS检查,相比之下,大都市县的这一比例为88.56%,总体县的比例为74.19%。POCUS的热点地区位于南加州和美国东部(每年每10000名医疗保险参保人平均有1441例)。冷点地区出现在大平原和中西部地区(每年每10000名医疗保险参保人平均有7.43例)。与冷点集群相比,热点集群在几个关键社会人口统计学和经济变量上存在显著差异(p < 0.001),包括人口密度更高(每平方英里703.6人对14.9人)、城市化程度更高(农村 - 城市连续体(RUC)为3.5对7.1)、受过大学教育的比例更高(25.1%对20.0%)、更有可能去急诊科就诊(每1000名医疗保险参保人725.8次对616.9次)、肥胖的可能性更高(19.0%对12.9%)、未参保的可能性更低(10.1%对13.0%)、黑人比例更高(8.5%对3.4%)以及西班牙裔比例更低(2.6%对5.5%)。结论 超声检查的可及性和使用情况在美国呈现出显著的地理空间趋势。热点县和冷点县在几个关键的社会人口统计学和经济变量上存在差异。