Suppr超能文献

荷兰围产期死亡率统计数据的可靠性。

The reliability of perinatal mortality statistics in The Netherlands.

作者信息

Doornbos J P, Nordbeck H J, Treffers P E

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 May;156(5):1183-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90138-4.

Abstract

All 13 hospitals in the municipality of Amsterdam cooperated in this study; labor ward records for the years 1981 and 1982 were personally searched for cases of perinatal death that corresponded with the World Health Organization definitions of perinatal mortality, presently applied in The Netherlands. The 360 cases that had apparently occurred in the Amsterdam hospitals were individually linked to the cases that had been entered into the national records at the Central Bureau of Statistics. The study established that the magnitude of underregistration of perinatal mortality is considerable (14.3%). Underregistration at the national level is due to underreporting by physicians and not due to errors in statistical bookkeeping. Underreporting is related to birth weight, that is, viability of the infant, and immigrant status of the mother. Recommendations are made to improve uniformity of notification criteria and reliability of perinatal mortality statistics.

摘要

阿姆斯特丹市的13家医院都参与了这项研究;研究人员亲自查阅了1981年和1982年的产房记录,以寻找符合世界卫生组织围产期死亡率定义(目前在荷兰适用)的围产期死亡病例。阿姆斯特丹各医院明显发生的360例病例分别与中央统计局录入国家记录的病例相关联。该研究证实,围产期死亡率漏报的程度相当大(14.3%)。国家层面的漏报是由于医生报告不足,而非统计簿记方面的错误。报告不足与出生体重即婴儿的存活性以及母亲的移民身份有关。文中提出了改进报告标准的一致性和围产期死亡率统计可靠性的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验