Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Vascular Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, China.
Vasa. 2022 Sep;51(5):275-281. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001010. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
The present study evaluated the prognosis of directional atherectomy (DA)+drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for femoropopliteal artery lesions compared with bare nitinol stent (BNS). This retrospective cohort study included patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions who underwent percutaneous endovascular surgery between January 2016 and June 2019. The primary outcome was the primary patency rate after 12, 24, and 36 months; the secondary outcomes comprised incidence of flow-limiting dissections, technical success, limb salvage, and all-cause death. During the study period, 110 (44%) patients underwent DA+DCB, and 140 (56%) patients underwent bare nitinol stent (BNS). There were no differences in the 12- and 24-month patency rates of the two groups (98.2% vs. 93.6% and 68.2% vs. 60.0%, both >.05). The 36-month primary patency rate in the DA+DCB group was significantly higher than that of the BNS group (27.3% vs. 15.7%, =.003). The technical success rate and all-cause death were similar between groups (>.05). Flow-limiting dissections occurred more frequently in the BNS group than in the DA+DCB group (27.9% vs. 10.9%, =.033). After adjustment for potential confounders, such as sex, smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, ABI after surgery, TASC II B, lesion length ≥15 cm, two-vessel runoff, and three-vessel runoff, the HR for primary patency rate comparing BNS to DA+DCB was 2.61 (95%CI: 1.61-4.25). In this retrospective cohort study, DA+DCB was associated with a higher 30-month primary patency rate and a lower flow-limiting dissection incidence than BNS.
本研究评估了定向旋切术(DA)+药物涂层球囊(DCB)血管成形术治疗股腘动脉病变与裸金属支架(BNS)的预后。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间接受经皮腔内血管手术的股腘动脉病变患者。主要结局为术后 12、24 和 36 个月的一期通畅率;次要结局包括血流受限性夹层的发生率、技术成功率、保肢率和全因死亡率。在研究期间,110 例(44%)患者接受了 DA+DCB,140 例(56%)患者接受了裸金属支架(BNS)。两组患者的 12 个月和 24 个月通畅率无差异(98.2% vs. 93.6%和 68.2% vs. 60.0%,均>.05)。DA+DCB 组的 36 个月一期通畅率明显高于 BNS 组(27.3% vs. 15.7%,=.003)。两组的技术成功率和全因死亡率相似(>.05)。BNS 组的血流受限性夹层发生率高于 DA+DCB 组(27.9% vs. 10.9%,=.033)。在调整性别、吸烟、高血压、高血脂、术后 ABI、TASC II B、病变长度≥15cm、双血管流出道、三血管流出道等潜在混杂因素后,BNS 与 DA+DCB 相比,一期通畅率的 HR 为 2.61(95%CI:1.61-4.25)。在这项回顾性队列研究中,与 BNS 相比,DA+DCB 与 30 个月时更高的一期通畅率和更低的血流受限性夹层发生率相关。