Ravelo Victor, Olate Gabriela, de Moraes Marcio, Guevara Henry Garcia, Parra Marcelo, Olate Sergio
Research Undergraduate Group in Dentistry (GIPO), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4810101, Chile.
Center of Excellence in Morphological and Surgical Studies (CEMyQ), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 23;11(13):3631. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133631.
The aim of this research was to analyze the facial class, presence of malocclusion, and the mandibular plane and to relate this to the mandibular condyle position. A cross-sectional study in subjects under analysis for orthognathic surgery was done. The mandibular plane, the gonial angle, and the molar class were included to compare the coronal and sagittal position of the condyle and the joint space observed in the CBCT. The measurements were obtained by the same observer at an interval of two weeks. In addition, the Spearman test was performed to determine the correlation using a p value < 0.05 to observe any significant differences. Eighty-nine male and female subjects (18 to 58 years old, 24.6 ± 10.5) were included. In the coronal section, subjects with CIII had a greater mediolateral distance (MLD, p = 0.0001) and greater vertical distance (SID, p = 0.0001) than subjects with CII. In terms of the skeletal class and the mandibular plane, it was observed that subjects in the CII group had a greater mandibular angle (open angle) (p = 0.04) than the CII group and was related to the anterior position of the condyle. The most anterior condylar position was observed in the CII group (p = 0.03), whereas a posterior condylar position was significant in CIII subjects (p = 0.03). We can conclude that the sagittal position of the TMJ was related to the mandibular plane and the skeletal class showing a higher mandibular angle and most anterior position of the condyle in CII subjects and a lower mandibular angle and most posterior position of the condyle in CIII subjects. The implications for surgical treatment have to be considered.
本研究的目的是分析面部类型、错牙合的存在情况以及下颌平面,并将其与下颌髁突位置相关联。对接受正颌外科分析的受试者进行了一项横断面研究。纳入下颌平面、下颌角和磨牙类型,以比较在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中观察到的髁突的冠状位和矢状位以及关节间隙。测量由同一名观察者每隔两周进行一次。此外,进行Spearman检验以确定相关性,使用p值<0.05来观察是否存在任何显著差异。纳入了89名男性和女性受试者(年龄在18至58岁之间,平均年龄24.6±10.5岁)。在冠状面上,与安氏II类受试者相比,安氏III类受试者的内外侧距离(MLD,p = 0.0001)和垂直距离(SID,p = 0.0001)更大。就骨骼类型和下颌平面而言,观察到安氏II类组受试者的下颌角(开口角)(p = 0.04)比安氏I类组更大,且与髁突的前位有关。在安氏II类组中观察到髁突最靠前的位置(p = 0.03),而在安氏III类受试者中髁突的后位显著(p = 0.03)。我们可以得出结论,颞下颌关节的矢状位与下颌平面和骨骼类型有关,表现为安氏II类受试者下颌角更高且髁突位置最靠前,而安氏III类受试者下颌角更低且髁突位置最靠后。必须考虑其对手术治疗的影响。