Ernat Justin J, Golijanin Petar, Peebles Annalise M, Eble Stephanie K, Midtgaard Kaare S, Provencher Matthew T
The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
JSES Int. 2022 Feb 26;6(4):581-586. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.007. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Anterior and posterior glenoid bone loss morphology have both been individually and morphologically described in previous studies. While there exists substantial literature on anterior bone loss, and emerging evidence describing posterior bone loss, a direct comparison between the two is lacking in the current literature. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare the anatomic and morphological differences in glenoid bone loss (GBL) in operative patients with anterior versus posterior glenohumeral instability.
All patients over a 3-year period indicated for operative stabilization with posterior glenohumeral instability and suspected glenoid bone loss who underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan were reviewed. Included patients were then singularly matched by gender, laterality, and age (±3 years) to a collection of patients who presented for operative stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability. GBL parameters were assessed based on the following characterizing measurements: (1) percentage of GBL, (2) glenoid vault version, (3) slope of the glenoid defect relative to the glenoid surface, (4) superior-inferior defect height, and (5) anterior-posterior defect width.
Sixty patients (30 anterior GBL, 30 posterior GBL) were included in the final analysis (60 males), with a mean age of 28.8 ± 8.15 years (range 16.0 to 51.0 years). Patients with anterior instability presented with higher GBL (24.94% ± 7.69 vs. 9.22% ± 5.58, < .001), greater superior-inferior defect height (23.89 ± 4.21 mm vs. 21.88 ± 3.42 mm, = .047), and steeper slope of glenoid defect (58.80° ± 11.86 vs. 38.59° ± 14.30, < .001), while patients with posterior instability had greater retroversion (1.53° ± 4.04 vs. 7.59° ± 7.71, < .001). Additionally, the anterior instability cohort had significantly more patients with moderate- to high-grade glenoid bone loss (n = 30) than patients with posterior instability (n = 11) ( < .001).
Anterior instability presents with a steeper slope of glenoid defect, higher percentage GBL, and greater superior-inferior defect height, whereas posterior instability presents with greater retroversion. This underscores the finding that anterior and posterior instability bone loss are not the same morphologically, and this should be considered in the operative treatment of glenohumeral instability.
先前的研究已经分别从形态学角度描述了肩胛盂前后侧的骨质流失情况。虽然有大量关于前侧骨质流失的文献,且也有新证据描述后侧骨质流失,但目前的文献中缺乏对两者的直接比较。本研究的目的是定量比较接受手术治疗的前侧与后侧盂肱关节不稳患者肩胛盂骨质流失(GBL)的解剖学和形态学差异。
回顾了在3年期间因后侧盂肱关节不稳和疑似肩胛盂骨质流失而接受计算机断层扫描(CT)并进行手术稳定治疗的所有患者。然后,将纳入的患者按性别、患侧和年龄(±3岁)与一组因前侧盂肱关节不稳而接受手术稳定治疗的患者进行单独匹配。基于以下特征测量评估GBL参数:(1)GBL百分比,(2)肩胛盂穹窿角度,(3)肩胛盂缺损相对于肩胛盂表面的斜率,(4)上下缺损高度,以及(5)前后缺损宽度。
最终分析纳入了60例患者(30例前侧GBL,30例后侧GBL)(均为男性),平均年龄为28.8 ± 8.15岁(范围16.0至51.0岁)。前侧不稳患者的GBL更高(24.94% ± 7.69 vs. 9.22% ± 5.58,< 0.001),上下缺损高度更大(23.89 ± 4.21 mm vs. 21.88 ± 3.42 mm,P = 0.047),肩胛盂缺损斜率更陡(58.80° ± 11.86 vs. 38.59° ± 14.30,< 0.001),而后侧不稳患者的后倾角更大(1.53° ± 4.04 vs. 7.59° ± 7.71,< 0.001)。此外,前侧不稳组中中度至高度肩胛盂骨质流失的患者(n = 30)明显多于后侧不稳组患者(n = 11)(< 0.001)。
前侧不稳表现为肩胛盂缺损斜率更陡、GBL百分比更高以及上下缺损高度更大,而后侧不稳表现为后倾角更大。这强调了前侧和后侧不稳骨质流失在形态学上不同的这一发现,在盂肱关节不稳的手术治疗中应予以考虑。