Suppr超能文献

整形外科学委员会认证:惩罚性措施分析。

Board Certification in Cosmetic Surgery: An Analysis of Punitive Actions.

机构信息

From the Department of Plastic Surgery and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; and Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Sep 1;150(3):713-717. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009443. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) diplomates complete training in aesthetic surgery through an Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited program. American Board of Cosmetic Surgery (ABCS) diplomates complete residency training in a "related" specialty, some historically nonsurgical, followed by an American Association of Cosmetic Surgery fellowship. Unlike the ABPS, the ABCS is not recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties as an equivalent certifying board. This study evaluated differences in the rates of punitive action against diplomates of the ABPS and the ABCS.

METHODS

Diplomates were accessed from their respective society's websites. Punitive action data were obtained by search of publicly available state medical board databases. A comparative analysis was performed between ABPS and ABCS.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred eight physicians were identified for comparative analysis. Two hundred sixty-six (22 percent) were members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and 549 (49 percent) were members of The Aesthetic Society. ABCS diplomates had significantly higher rates of disciplinary administrative action by their respective state medical boards [ n = 31 (9.0 percent)] when compared with ABPS members [The Aesthetic Society, n = 26 (4.4 percent); ABPS, n = 8 (3.1 percent); p = 0.003], with a higher proportion of repeat offenders. In addition, ABCS diplomates had more public letters of reprimand [ABCS, n = 12 (3.5 percent); The Aesthetic Society, n = 6 (1.2 percent); and ABPS, n = 2 (0.8 percent); p = 0.015].

CONCLUSIONS

ABCS diplomates have significantly higher rates of punitive actions than ABPS diplomates. Although the reasons for this discrepancy warrant further investigation, punitive data should be transparently and publicly available to aid patients in informed decision-making.

摘要

背景

美国整形外科学会(ABPS)的委员会成员通过经研究生医学教育认证委员会认证的项目完成美容外科学培训。美国美容外科学会(ABCS)的委员会成员在历史上非外科的“相关”专业完成住院医师培训,然后完成美国美容外科学会的奖学金培训。与 ABPS 不同,ABCS 未被美国医学专业委员会认可为同等认证委员会。本研究评估了 ABPS 和 ABCS 委员会成员受到惩罚性行动的比率差异。

方法

从各自学会的网站获取委员会成员的信息。通过公开的州医学委员会数据库搜索获取惩罚性行动数据。对 ABPS 和 ABCS 进行比较分析。

结果

确定了 1208 名医生进行比较分析。266 名(22%)为美国整形外科学会会员,549 名(49%)为美容外科学会会员。与 ABPS 成员相比,ABCS 委员会成员受到各自州医学委员会纪律处分的比例明显更高[ n = 31(9.0%)],且累犯比例更高。此外,ABCS 委员会成员收到的公开谴责信更多[ABCS,n = 12(3.5%);美容外科学会,n = 6(1.2%);ABPS,n = 2(0.8%);p = 0.015]。

结论

ABCS 委员会成员受到的惩罚性行动比率明显高于 ABPS 委员会成员。尽管这种差异的原因值得进一步调查,但惩罚性数据应该透明和公开,以帮助患者做出明智的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验