• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 年预后良好的严重创伤性脑损伤幸存者的指令跟随时间。

Time to Follow Commands in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors With Favorable Recovery at 2 Years.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2022 Oct 1;91(4):633-640. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002087. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000002087
PMID:35833650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10553145/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recovery of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors with long-term favorable outlook is understudied. Time to follow commands varies widely in this patient population but has important clinical implications.

OBJECTIVE

To (1) evaluate time to follow commands in severe patients with TBI with favorable outcomes, (2) characterize their trajectory of recovery, and (3) identify predictors associated with delayed cognitive improvement.

METHODS

Participants were recruited prospectively at a Level I trauma center through the Brain Trauma Research Center from 2003 to 2018. Inclusion criteria were age 16 to 80 years, Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8 and motor score <6, and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended measure ≥4 at 2 years postinjury.

RESULTS

In 580 patients, there were 229 (39.5%) deaths and 140 (24.1%) patients had favorable outcomes at 2 years. The mean age was 33.7 ± 14.5 years, median Glasgow Coma Scale was 7 (IQR 6-7), and median Injury Severity Score was 30 (IQR 26-38). The mean time to follow commands was 12.7 ± 11.8 days. On multivariable linear regression, the presence of diffuse axonal injury (B = 9.2 days [4.8, 13.7], P < .0001) or intraventricular hemorrhage (B = 6.4 days [0.5, 12.3], P < .035) was associated with longer time before following commands and patients who developed nosocomial infections (B = 6.5 days [1.6-11.4], P < .01).

CONCLUSION

In severe TBI survivors with favorable outcomes, time to follow commands varied widely. Most patients began to follow commands within 2 weeks. Evidence of diffuse axonal injury, intraventricular hemorrhage, and infections can delay cognitive improvement in the acute period. Patients make considerable recovery up to 2 years after their injury.

摘要

背景

长期预后良好的严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)幸存者的恢复情况研究较少。该患者群体的听从指令时间差异很大,但具有重要的临床意义。

目的

(1)评估预后良好的严重 TBI 患者听从指令的时间,(2)描述他们的恢复轨迹,(3)确定与认知改善延迟相关的预测因素。

方法

参与者通过 Brain Trauma Research Center 从 2003 年至 2018 年在一级创伤中心前瞻性招募。纳入标准为年龄 16 至 80 岁,损伤后 2 年格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分≤8 分,运动评分 <6 分,格拉斯哥结局量表扩展版(GOSE)测量值≥4 分。

结果

在 580 例患者中,229 例(39.5%)死亡,140 例(24.1%)患者在 2 年时预后良好。平均年龄为 33.7 ± 14.5 岁,中位数 GCS 为 7(IQR 6-7),中位数损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为 30(IQR 26-38)。听从指令的平均时间为 12.7 ± 11.8 天。多变量线性回归显示,弥漫性轴索损伤(B = 9.2 天[4.8, 13.7],P <.0001)或脑室内出血(B = 6.4 天[0.5, 12.3],P <.035)的存在与听从指令前的时间较长相关,且发生医院获得性感染的患者(B = 6.5 天[1.6-11.4],P <.01)。

结论

在预后良好的严重 TBI 幸存者中,听从指令的时间差异很大。大多数患者在 2 周内开始听从指令。弥漫性轴索损伤、脑室内出血和感染的证据可在急性期延迟认知改善。患者在受伤后 2 年内仍有较大的恢复。

相似文献

1
Time to Follow Commands in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors With Favorable Recovery at 2 Years.2 年预后良好的严重创伤性脑损伤幸存者的指令跟随时间。
Neurosurgery. 2022 Oct 1;91(4):633-640. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002087. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
Clinical characteristics and temporal profile of recovery in patients with favorable outcomes at 6 months after severe traumatic brain injury.严重创伤性脑损伤后 6 个月预后良好患者的临床特征和恢复的时间进程。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;129(1):234-240. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.JNS162720. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
Prognostic Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Diffuse Axonal Injuries: Analysis of Outcomes and Review of Literature.磁共振成像在检测弥漫性轴索损伤中的预后意义:结果分析及文献复习。
Neurol India. 2022 Nov-Dec;70(6):2371-2377. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.364066.
4
Prognosis of diffuse axonal injury with traumatic brain injury.弥漫性轴索损伤伴脑外伤的预后。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):155-159. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001852.
5
Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study.在前瞻性、纵向 TRACK-TBI 研究中,中度至重度创伤性脑损伤后第一年的功能结局。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Aug 1;78(8):982-992. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2043.
6
Traumatic hemorrhagic brain injury: impact of location and resorption on cognitive outcome.创伤性出血性脑损伤:部位和吸收对认知结局的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):796-804. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.JNS151781. Epub 2016 May 27.
7
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Recovery of Consciousness and Functional Outcome in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.意识恢复和中重度创伤性脑损伤的功能预后。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 May 1;78(5):548-557. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0084.
9
Recovery of Patients with Pure Diffuse Axonal Injury Who Remained in a Coma for 6 Hours or More.昏迷6小时及以上的单纯弥漫性轴索损伤患者的恢复情况。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.101. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
10
Diffuse Axonal Injury Grade on Early MRI is Associated with Worse Outcome in Children with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.早期 MRI 上弥漫性轴索损伤分级与中重度创伤性脑损伤患儿的预后不良相关。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Apr;36(2):492-503. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01336-8. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Subcellular and macrostructural immediate responders to airblast traumatic brain injury.空气冲击波创伤性脑损伤的亚细胞和宏观结构即时反应者。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):28454. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13288-6.
2
Characteristics and recovery trends of severe TBI patients with a favorable functional outcome at 6-month follow-up.6个月随访时功能预后良好的重度创伤性脑损伤患者的特征及恢复趋势。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 13;48(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03163-9.
3
Time to Command-Following and Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后执行指令的时间及结果
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2449928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49928.
4
Influence of health insurance on withdrawal of life sustaining treatment for patients with isolated traumatic brain injury: a retrospective multi-center observational cohort study.医疗保险对单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者停止生命维持治疗的影响:一项回顾性多中心观察性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Jul 18;28(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05027-6.
5
Predicting Functional Dependency in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A TBI-Model Systems and TRACK-TBI Study.预测意识障碍患者的功能依赖性:一项 TBI 模型系统和 TRACK-TBI 研究。
Ann Neurol. 2023 Dec;94(6):1008-1023. doi: 10.1002/ana.26741. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Early Shared Decision-Making for Older Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury: Using Time-Limited Trials and Understanding Their Limitations.早期共同决策在老年创伤性脑损伤患者中的应用:使用限时试验并了解其局限性。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Oct;39(2):284-293. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01764-8. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
7
Traumatic Brain Injury: Contemporary Challenges and the Path to Progress.创伤性脑损伤:当代挑战与进展之路
J Clin Med. 2023 May 5;12(9):3283. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093283.
8
Performance of CRASH and IMPACT Prognostic Models for Traumatic Brain Injury at 12 and 24 Months Post-Injury.CRASH和IMPACT创伤性脑损伤预后模型在伤后12个月和24个月时的表现。
Neurotrauma Rep. 2023 Mar 1;4(1):118-123. doi: 10.1089/neur.2022.0082. eCollection 2023.