• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在两个果蝇亲缘种中,转录反应倾向于不同的饲养环境成分。

Transcriptional responses are oriented towards different components of the rearing environment in two Drosophila sibling species.

机构信息

Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

BMC Genomics. 2022 Jul 16;23(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08745-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12864-022-08745-9
PMID:35840900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9288027/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The chance to compare patterns of differential gene expression in related ecologically distinct species can be particularly fruitful to investigate the genetics of adaptation and phenotypic plasticity. In this regard, a powerful technique such as RNA-Seq applied to ecologically amenable taxa allows to address issues that are not possible in classic model species. Here, we study gene expression profiles and larval performance of the cactophilic siblings Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae reared in media that approximate natural conditions and evaluate both chemical and nutritional components of the diet. These closely related species are complementary in terms of host-plant use since the primary host of one is the secondary of the other. D. koepferae is mainly a columnar cactus dweller while D. buzzatii prefers Opuntia hosts.

RESULTS

Our comparative study shows that D. buzzatii and D. koepferae have different transcriptional strategies to face the challenges posed by their natural resources. The former has greater transcriptional plasticity, and its response is mainly modulated by alkaloids of its secondary host, while the latter has a more canalized genetic response, and its transcriptional plasticity is associated with the cactus species.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study unveils a complex pleiotropic genetic landscape in both species, with functional links that relate detox responses and redox mechanisms with developmental and neurobiological processes. These results contribute to deepen our understanding of the role of host plant shifts and natural stress driving ecological specialization.

摘要

背景

比较相关生态差异物种中差异基因表达模式的机会对于研究适应和表型可塑性的遗传学特别有成效。在这方面,RNA-Seq 等强大技术应用于生态适宜的分类群,可以解决经典模式物种不可能解决的问题。在这里,我们研究了在接近自然条件的培养基中饲养的嗜仙人掌果蝇 buzzatii 和 D. koepferae 的基因表达谱和幼虫表现,并评估了饮食的化学和营养成分。这两个密切相关的物种在宿主植物的利用上是互补的,因为一个物种的主要宿主是另一个物种的次要宿主。D. koepferae 主要是柱状仙人掌的居住者,而 D. buzzatii 则更喜欢 Opuntia 宿主。

结果

我们的比较研究表明,D. buzzatii 和 D. koepferae 有不同的转录策略来应对其自然资源带来的挑战。前者具有更大的转录可塑性,其反应主要由其次要宿主的生物碱调节,而后者具有更趋同的遗传反应,其转录可塑性与仙人掌物种有关。

结论

我们的研究揭示了这两个物种中复杂的多效遗传景观,其中与解毒反应和氧化还原机制有关的功能联系与发育和神经生物学过程有关。这些结果有助于加深我们对宿主植物转移和自然胁迫驱动生态特化作用的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab67/9288027/2ead463ae363/12864_2022_8745_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab67/9288027/e2668af5499a/12864_2022_8745_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab67/9288027/3b6c46e2ce55/12864_2022_8745_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab67/9288027/2ead463ae363/12864_2022_8745_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab67/9288027/e2668af5499a/12864_2022_8745_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab67/9288027/3b6c46e2ce55/12864_2022_8745_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab67/9288027/2ead463ae363/12864_2022_8745_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Transcriptional responses are oriented towards different components of the rearing environment in two Drosophila sibling species.在两个果蝇亲缘种中,转录反应倾向于不同的饲养环境成分。
BMC Genomics. 2022 Jul 16;23(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08745-9.
2
Differences in tolerance to host cactus alkaloids in Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii.科氏果蝇和巴氏果蝇对宿主仙人掌生物碱耐受性的差异。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 10;9(2):e88370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088370. eCollection 2014.
3
Host Plant Adaptation in Cactophilic Species of the Drosophila buzzatii Cluster: Fitness and Transcriptomics.果蝇 buzzatii 类群中嗜仙人掌物种的寄主植物适应性:适合度和转录组学。
J Hered. 2019 Jan 7;110(1):46-57. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esy043.
4
Transcriptome modulation during host shift is driven by secondary metabolites in desert Drosophila.沙漠果蝇宿主转移过程中的转录组调控由次生代谢产物驱动。
Mol Ecol. 2016 Sep;25(18):4534-50. doi: 10.1111/mec.13785. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
5
Oviposition acceptance and fecundity schedule in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae on their natural hosts.嗜仙人掌的近缘物种布氏果蝇和科氏果蝇在其自然宿主上的产卵接受情况和繁殖力时间表。
Evolution. 2001 Dec;55(12):2615-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00774.x.
6
Wing morphology and fluctuating asymmetry depend on the host plant in cactophilic Drosophila.在嗜仙人掌果蝇中,翅膀形态和波动不对称性取决于宿主植物。
J Evol Biol. 2008 Mar;21(2):598-609. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01474.x. Epub 2007 Dec 13.
7
Genomics of ecological adaptation in cactophilic Drosophila.嗜仙人掌果蝇生态适应的基因组学
Genome Biol Evol. 2014 Dec 31;7(1):349-66. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu291.
8
Patterns of variation in wing morphology in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii and its sibling D. koepferae.嗜仙人掌果蝇(Drosophila buzzatii)及其近缘种科氏果蝇(D. koepferae)翅形态的变异模式。
J Evol Biol. 2006 Jul;19(4):1275-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01078.x.
9
Pupal emergence pattern in cactophilic Drosophila and the effect of host plants.蛹期出孔模式在嗜仙人掌果蝇中的表现及与宿主植物的关系。
Insect Sci. 2018 Dec;25(6):1108-1118. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12484. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
10
Comparative molecular population genetics of the Xdh locus in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae.嗜仙人掌果蝇近缘种巴氏果蝇和科普费果蝇中Xdh基因座的比较分子群体遗传学
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jan;21(1):141-52. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh006. Epub 2003 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Ortholog genes from cactophilic Drosophila provide insight into human adaptation to hallucinogenic cacti.嗜仙人掌果蝇的同源基因为研究人类对致幻仙人掌的适应提供了线索。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 1;12(1):13180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17118-x.
2
De novo transcriptome analysis and identification of genes associated with immunity, detoxification and energy metabolism from the fat body of the tephritid gall fly, Procecidochares utilis.从头转录组分析及鉴定与免疫、解毒和能量代谢相关基因在桔小实蝇脂肪体中的作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 17;14(12):e0226039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226039. eCollection 2019.
3
Gene Expression and Diet Breadth in Plant-Feeding Insects: Summarizing Trends.
植物取食性昆虫的基因表达和饮食广度:总结趋势。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Mar;35(3):259-277. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
4
What does mitogenomics tell us about the evolutionary history of the Drosophila buzzatii cluster (repleta group)?种系发生基因组学告诉了我们果蝇 buzzatii 类群(repleta 组)的进化历史的哪些信息?
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0220676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220676. eCollection 2019.
5
Evolutionary genomics of host plant adaptation: insights from Drosophila.宿主植物适应的进化基因组学:来自果蝇的见解。
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019 Dec;36:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
6
Pleiotropic Effects of and on Pigmentation and Cuticular Hydrocarbon Composition in .关于[具体物种]中[相关因素]对色素沉着和表皮烃类组成的多效性影响。 (你提供的原文有部分内容缺失,我根据格式推测补充了[具体物种]、[相关因素],若与实际不符,请根据正确内容修改译文。)
Front Physiol. 2019 May 1;10:518. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00518. eCollection 2019.
7
Host use and host shifts in Drosophila.果蝇中的宿主利用和宿主转移。
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019 Feb;31:139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
Structural and Functional Annotation of Eukaryotic Genomes with GenSAS.使用GenSAS对真核生物基因组进行结构和功能注释。
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1962:29-51. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_3.
9
FlyBase 2.0: the next generation.FlyBase 2.0:下一代。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D759-D765. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1003.
10
Transcriptomic response of female adult moths to host and non-host plants in two closely related species.雌雄成虫对两种近缘植物的转录组反应。
BMC Evol Biol. 2018 Sep 20;18(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12862-018-1257-3.