Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave., Rm S380, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Population Health Division, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Prev Sci. 2022 Nov;23(8):1448-1456. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01397-x. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
It is critical to understand what happens when PrEP patients are lost-to-follow-up (LTFU) and, where appropriate, attempt to re-engage them in care with the goal of preventing future human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition. We evaluated the benefits and limitations of using text-based outreach to re-engage with LTFU PrEP patients and offer re-initiation of PrEP care. Using text-messaging, we surveyed San Francisco City Clinic patients who started PrEP from January 2015 to October 2019 and were LTFU by October 1, 2020. Our goals were to better understand (1) whether our patients remained on PrEP through another provider or source, (2) why patients choose to discontinue PrEP, and (3) whether text-based outreach could successfully re-engage such patients in care. Multiple-choice survey questions were analyzed quantitatively to determine the proportion of respondents selecting each option; free-text responses were analyzed qualitatively using an inductive approach to identify any additional recurring themes. Of 846 eligible survey recipients, 130 responded (overall response rate 15.4%). Forty-two respondents (32.3%) were still on PrEP through another provider while 88 (67.7%) were not. Common reasons for stopping PrEP included: COVID-19-related changes in sex life (32.3% of responses), concerns regarding side effects (17.7%), and the need to take a daily pill (8.3%). Free text responses revealed additional concerns regarding risk compensation. While 32 participants agreed to be contacted by City clinic staff for PrEP counseling, only 6 were reached by phone and none of the six subsequently restarted PrEP. We learned that text messaging is a possible approach to survey certain PrEP program participants to determine who is truly LTFU and off PrEP, and to better understand reasons for PrEP discontinuation. While such information could prove valuable as programs seek to address barriers to PrEP retention, efforts to improve acceptability and increase response rates would be necessary. We were less successful in re-engaging LTFU patients in PrEP care, suggesting that text-messaging may not be the optimal strategy for this purpose.
了解接受 PrEP 治疗的患者失访(LTFU)后会发生什么情况至关重要,并且在适当的情况下,尝试重新让他们接受治疗,以预防未来的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染。我们评估了使用基于文本的外展服务重新接触 LTFU PrEP 患者并提供重新开始 PrEP 护理的益处和局限性。我们使用短信向 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月期间开始接受 PrEP 治疗且截至 2020 年 10 月 1 日失访的旧金山城市诊所患者进行了调查。我们的目标是更好地了解(1)我们的患者是否通过其他提供者或来源继续接受 PrEP 治疗,(2)患者选择停止 PrEP 的原因,以及(3)基于文本的外展服务是否可以成功地重新让此类患者接受治疗。对多项选择题调查问题进行了定量分析,以确定选择每个选项的受访者比例;使用归纳方法对自由文本回复进行了定性分析,以确定是否存在任何其他反复出现的主题。在 846 名符合条件的调查对象中,有 130 人做出了回应(总体回应率为 15.4%)。42 名受访者(32.3%)仍通过其他提供者继续接受 PrEP 治疗,而 88 名受访者(67.7%)则没有。停止使用 PrEP 的常见原因包括:与 COVID-19 相关的性生活变化(32.3%的回应)、对副作用的担忧(17.7%)以及需要每天服药(8.3%)。自由文本回复显示,人们对风险补偿的担忧有所增加。尽管 32 名参与者同意接受城市诊所工作人员的 PrEP 咨询电话,但只有 6 名参与者接到了电话,而且这 6 名参与者都没有重新开始服用 PrEP。我们了解到,短信服务可能是调查某些 PrEP 项目参与者的一种方法,可以确定谁是真正的 LTFU 并停止使用 PrEP,并更好地了解停止使用 PrEP 的原因。虽然这些信息可能对项目解决 PrEP 保留障碍很有价值,但仍需要努力提高可接受性并提高回复率。我们在重新接触 LTFU 患者接受 PrEP 治疗方面的效果较差,这表明短信服务可能不是此目的的最佳策略。